From: Bill White <billw@wolfram.com>
Subject: Re: the gnus-newsgroup-unseen mark is too sticky
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 11:45:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3adtuizsy.fsf@wolfram.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3k7sy50vl.fsf@wolfram.com> (Bill White's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:46:06 -0600")
On Wed Feb 27 2002 at 10:46, Bill White <billw@wolfram.com> said:
> On Tue Feb 26 2002 at 12:17, Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> said:
>
>> Add a function to `gnus-mark-article-hook' that removes the unseen
>> mark when you select an article.
>
> Thanks - I'll look into that.
This handles the re-highlighting after I do something that *selects*
the article:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(defun my-remove-article-from-unseen ()
(setq gnus-newsgroup-unseen
(delq article gnus-newsgroup-unseen)))
(add-hook 'gnus-mark-article-hook 'my-remove-article-from-unseen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't visually remove the unseen mark symbol ".", but that's not
important for me. Also, this has no effect if I do something that
doesn't select the article, like marking by hand with 'd'. All in
all, it does about 90% of WIM.
Now that I've played around with this, I think limiting to unseens
would be more effective than highlighting unseens. It would focus my
attention on them better and it would probably be a cleaner way to do
this, but I can't find a way to limit like that.
Any hints on limiting to unseen? Hey - how about a dedicated key,
like '/ .' and a related function that could be run automatically upon
entering a group?
Cheers -
bw
--
Bill White . billw@wolfram.com . http://members.wri.com/billw
"No ma'am, we're musicians."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-27 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-26 14:02 Bill White
2002-02-26 16:53 ` Harry Putnam
2002-02-26 16:53 ` Harry Putnam
2002-02-27 4:31 ` Bill White
2002-02-27 4:31 ` Bill White
2002-02-27 6:15 ` Harry Putnam
2002-02-27 6:15 ` Harry Putnam
2002-02-26 18:17 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-02-27 16:46 ` Bill White
2002-02-27 17:45 ` Bill White [this message]
2002-02-28 12:35 ` Bill White
2002-02-28 12:35 ` Bill White
2002-02-27 17:45 ` Bill White
2002-02-27 16:46 ` Bill White
2002-02-26 18:17 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-02-26 14:02 Bill White
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3adtuizsy.fsf@wolfram.com \
--to=billw@wolfram.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).