gnus-summary-show-raw-article change?

gnus-summary-show-raw-article change?

[James Cloos]

As of commit c4ec1d88972a1f69fd552518d46eb108e3b5987a
the calls to gnus-summary-show-raw-article do nothing.

This breaks my report-as-spam and report-as-edible functs,
which need to (call-process-region) on the (widen) of the
raw article.

Should I be doing something different than:

(defun jimc-gnus-dspam-report-false-positive (n)
  "Submit false-positive to dspam."
  (interactive "p")
  (gnus-summary-show-raw-article)
  (gnus-eval-in-buffer-window gnus-article-buffer
    (save-restriction
      (widen)
      (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) "/usr/bin/dspam"
      nil 0 nil
      "--mode=teft" "--user" "ME" "--class=innocent" "--source=error"))))


-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Re: gnus-summary-show-raw-article change?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> writes:

>   (gnus-eval-in-buffer-window gnus-article-buffer

If you want to do something with the original raw article, working with
`gnus-original-article-buffer' is usually easier.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: gnus-summary-show-raw-article change?

[James Cloos]

>>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

LMI> James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> writes:
>> (gnus-eval-in-buffer-window gnus-article-buffer

LMI> If you want to do something with the original raw article, working
LMI> with `gnus-original-article-buffer' is usually easier.

OK.  Makes sense.  

Now I just need to decide on what notification I should have them do.
(The side-effect of the raw article helped make it obvious that the
command did something. :)

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6