* position of point in *Summary* buffer after a few commands
@ 2001-10-17 3:57 John H. Palmieri
2001-12-30 0:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: John H. Palmieri @ 2001-10-17 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
One comment and one unreproducible bug:
The comment is, if I'm in the Summary buffer with the mark set, and
if I hit C-w, the articles in the region are marked as read, but would
it also make sense to set the mark at the point? If I want to mark a
bunch of articles as read, I might set the mark, scroll down a bit,
hit C-w, then repeat. Theoretically, it might not make any difference
whether the mark is in its original position or gets reset after each
C-w, but it seems faster to mark a smaller number of files, at least
in a large Summary buffer.
The bug is, if I'm in the Summary buffer (of a mail group) and hit
C-u B DEL, some of the time the point ends up in a seemingly random
position between where it started and where it should end up (four
articles later). This is unreproducible; maybe it happens more when
I'm deleting messages in a deep thread?
--
J. H. Palmieri
Dept of Mathematics, Box 354350 mailto:palmieri@math.washington.edu
University of Washington http://www.math.washington.edu/~palmieri/
Seattle, WA 98195-4350
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: position of point in *Summary* buffer after a few commands
2001-10-17 3:57 position of point in *Summary* buffer after a few commands John H. Palmieri
@ 2001-12-30 0:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2001-12-30 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
palmieri@math.washington.edu (John H. Palmieri) writes:
> The comment is, if I'm in the Summary buffer with the mark set, and
> if I hit C-w, the articles in the region are marked as read, but would
> it also make sense to set the mark at the point?
If we compare the situation to killing a region of text, `C-w' kills
the region between mark and point; it doesn't kill the character under
point. So I think the current behavior makes sense.
> The bug is, if I'm in the Summary buffer (of a mail group) and hit
> C-u B DEL, some of the time the point ends up in a seemingly random
> position between where it started and where it should end up (four
> articles later). This is unreproducible; maybe it happens more when
> I'm deleting messages in a deep thread?
I haven't seen this...
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-30 0:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-17 3:57 position of point in *Summary* buffer after a few commands John H. Palmieri
2001-12-30 0:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).