Re: Possible bug in nnml code

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>]

Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com> writes:

> The general idea is to:
>
> 1. Rewrite the nnmail-cache-* functions somewhat:
>
>   -- they should be able to operate on multiple groups per article (to
>      support crossposts),
>
>   -- one should be able to implement nnmail-cache differently (in my
>      case, I am working on an SQL-based implementation and it seems to
>      work pretty well so far).

Sounds like a good idea, except for the SQL part.  :-)  That'll limit
the usefulness for other users quite heavily.

And, yes, the name "cache" is quite confusing.  Perhaps something
like "registry" or the like would be clearer.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen