* Sorting threads, my way
@ 1999-12-08 18:11 wjhardaker
2000-04-21 19:22 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: wjhardaker @ 1999-12-08 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
So, I'm tired of missing messages in my inbox because I sort my
threads by number (easiest age specification) and they end up too high
up in the buffer (or more likely in the middle) and I don't see them.
This only sorts the top messages in the thread though. What'd I like
is that when a new article comes in, that the entire thread is moved
back to the bottom. In other words, I want to sort by the highest
number in the entire thread. Has anyone done this? Is it too slow?
--
"Ninjas aren't dangerous. They're more afraid of you than you are of them."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Sorting threads, my way
1999-12-08 18:11 Sorting threads, my way wjhardaker
@ 2000-04-21 19:22 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2000-04-21 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
wjhardaker@ucdavis.edu writes:
> In other words, I want to sort by the highest number in the entire
> thread. Has anyone done this? Is it too slow?
I don't think it would be particularly slow, and writing is should be
easy enough. Just look at what `gnus-thread-total-score' does, and
instead of adding together scores, just return `max' of all the
message numbers.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-04-21 19:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-12-08 18:11 Sorting threads, my way wjhardaker
2000-04-21 19:22 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).