Re: nnimap ports and protocols

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> That could be mapped in the Server buffer.  We already have a standard
> way of editing forms in Gnus (server edit, topic/group parameter edit,
> etc.) so this is not a bad way, usability-wise.

Yeah, that's true.  I think that's the way to go, then.

What about questions from the tls layer about "do you want to accept
this invalid certificate from the server?" and stuff?  If that's to be
stored in the server, then open-gnutls-stream should return both the
stream and, er, something that says something about this.  Perhaps a
plist of properties, like :certificate :invalid-but-accepted or
something.

Or is that a more global thing?  "I accept this certificate" sounds a
bit more global...  and it's user-generated, too.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen