* Mail-Copies-To broken?
@ 2002-03-17 4:44 Henrik Enberg
2002-03-17 9:46 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Henrik Enberg @ 2002-03-17 4:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
Gnus seems to ignore Mail-Copies-To when doing F in mail. Isn't this
somewhat wrong?
--
<http://petition.eurolinux.org/>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Mail-Copies-To broken?
2002-03-17 4:44 Mail-Copies-To broken? Henrik Enberg
@ 2002-03-17 9:46 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-03-17 17:20 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-03-18 11:09 ` Per Abrahamsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2002-03-17 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
Henrik Enberg <henrik@enberg.org> writes:
> Gnus seems to ignore Mail-Copies-To when doing F in mail. Isn't this
> somewhat wrong?
Isn't Mail-Followups-To for mail whereas Mail-Copies-To is for news?
kai
--
Silence is foo!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Mail-Copies-To broken?
2002-03-17 9:46 ` Kai Großjohann
@ 2002-03-17 17:20 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-03-17 20:36 ` Paul Jarc
2002-03-18 11:09 ` Per Abrahamsen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Henrik Enberg @ 2002-03-17 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> Henrik Enberg <henrik@enberg.org> writes:
>
>> Gnus seems to ignore Mail-Copies-To when doing F in mail. Isn't this
>> somewhat wrong?
>
> Isn't Mail-Followups-To for mail whereas Mail-Copies-To is for news?
Hmm, I didn't know that. I got flamed for not obeying it. I guess its
my time to flame back.
--
<http://petition.eurolinux.org/>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Mail-Copies-To broken?
2002-03-17 17:20 ` Henrik Enberg
@ 2002-03-17 20:36 ` Paul Jarc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jarc @ 2002-03-17 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
Henrik Enberg <henrik@enberg.org> wrote:
> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>> Henrik Enberg <henrik@enberg.org> writes:
>>> Gnus seems to ignore Mail-Copies-To when doing F in mail. Isn't this
>>> somewhat wrong?
>>
>> Isn't Mail-Followups-To for mail whereas Mail-Copies-To is for news?
>
> Hmm, I didn't know that. I got flamed for not obeying it. I guess its
> my time to flame back.
Mail-Followup(no "s")-To is like Folloup-To, but for mail. It's not
defined in any RFC, so don't try to argue MFT on those grounds.
Mail-Copies-To is defined in an RFC, I think, but only for news. I
had thought Gnus noticed it for mail as well, and that it was the only
UA to do so. Anyway, MFT can express anything expressible with MCT.
So pragmatically, anyone setting MCT in mail ought to set MFT as well,
in order to make their intensions known to as many MUAs as possible.
paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Mail-Copies-To broken?
2002-03-17 9:46 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-03-17 17:20 ` Henrik Enberg
@ 2002-03-18 11:09 ` Per Abrahamsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Per Abrahamsen @ 2002-03-18 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Henrik Enberg, ding
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> Isn't Mail-Followups-To for mail whereas Mail-Copies-To is for news?
No. Mail-Copies-To are for both mail and news.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-18 11:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-17 4:44 Mail-Copies-To broken? Henrik Enberg
2002-03-17 9:46 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-03-17 17:20 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-03-17 20:36 ` Paul Jarc
2002-03-18 11:09 ` Per Abrahamsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).