Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Griffith <griffith@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: John Griffith  <griffith@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de>
Subject: Unnecessary nntp reading?
Date: 31 May 1997 12:14:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tj7mgghrte.fsf_-_@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: gnus-bug@ifi.uio.no's message of 05 Dec 1996 16:59:11 +0100

I have all my mail (nnml) groups on levels 1 and 2 and all nntp groups
on 3 and 4.

I'm trying to figure out what several variables do and how they
interact with each other.  Namely the variables:
  - gnus-activate-level
  - gnus-read-active-file
  - gnus-check-new-newsgroups

A) If I set gnus-activate-level to 1 and gnus-check-new-newsgroups to
   nil I would suspect that the nntp server should not be read at all,
   but it is - even if gnus-read-active-file is nil as well. However,
   as I would expect, the nntp groups are not updated.  What is Gnus
   looking for?  It's not looking for newgroups and it's not looking
   for active information on my nntp groups.

B) If I set gnus-activate-level to 1 and gnus-check-new-newsgroups to
   nil and gnus-read-active-file to `some' then I would suspect that
   (regardless of A above) the nntp groups' active information would
   not be read - but they are.

The documentation for gnus-read-active-file says "If this variable is
`some', Gnus will try to only read the relevant parts of the active
file from the server."  I would think that the definition of a
"relevant part" should take into consideration that fact that if
gnus-activate-level is lower than all nntp groups (and no prefix
argument was given) then there are _no_ relevant parts.

Furthermore, what I would like (and expect) is that setting
gnus-activate-level to 3 and gnus-read-active-file to `some' would
allow me to put some "subscribed" nntp groups on level 4 but not have
their active information updated (and therefor not spend lots of time)
unless I use an explicit prefix argument to "M-x gnus" or "g" from the
group buffer, etc.

If these things are not bugs, then I think the documentation of these
variables should explain and motivate this behavior.


             reply	other threads:[~1997-05-31 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-05-31 10:14 John Griffith [this message]
1997-06-06  3:12 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1997-06-06  9:06   ` John Griffith
1997-06-06 17:41     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tj7mgghrte.fsf_-_@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de \
    --to=griffith@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).