Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Greiner <kgreiner@xpediantsolutions.com>
Subject: Re: Gnus Agent and mail
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 09:43:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <u7k8yx3od.fsf@xpediantsolutions.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87llxhm2ol.fsf@cam.ac.uk>

Gaute B Strokkenes <gs234@cam.ac.uk> writes:

> [It's a bit late to reply to this now, but I've been offline for quite
> some time, so...]
>
> On 29 apr 2003, kgreiner@xpediantsolutions.com wrote:
>>Gaute B Strokkenes <gs234@cam.ac.uk> writes:
>>
>>>On 14 apr 2003, kai.grossjohann@gmx.net wrote:
>>>I think there ought to be an option to control whether or not the
>>>agent should queue mail--it seems easy to add, and it's clearly
>>>useful.
>>
>>While I agree with the intent, I don't like the idea of changing the
>>definition of gnus-plugged to cover every back-end EXCEPT imap.
>
> Hmm, where did IMAP get into this?

I meant nnimap.

> As far as I know, for mail the machinery for sending mail is totally
> decoupled from that for receiving it (unlike news).  For instance, I
> have both nnimap and nnml groups, but when I send email it is always
> sent with whatever message-send-mail-function specifies.

True.  I personally don't use gnus with my mail so I'm coming up to
speed by making foolish statements :).

> What I would like is a variable gnus-agent-queue-mail such that:
>
>   always -> always queue mail that is sent, regardless of plugged status.
>   nil -> never queue mail that is sent, regardless of plugged status.
>   otherwise, queue mail that is sent if and only if gnus is unplugged.

Yes. Sounds perfectly reasonable.  My concerns are:
1) If I do this for mail sending, will someone else have an equally
   valid argument for why backend X should also have its own "obey
   gnus-plugged" configuration setting?
2) Just how more complex must the configuration get before it is sufficient?

BTW, I'm actually convincing myself that gnus-agent-queue-mail is the
reasonable thing to do.

> Or at least that is what I would have liked; I now have a permanent
> internet connection so don't use the agent much anymore.
>
>>I think that it would be better to change the code such that the
>>plugged status per server can be configured to either 1) always
>>plugged, 2) never plugged , or 3) plugged when gnus-plugged is t.
>
> That might be useful too.

Already voted done.  My interpretation of the gnus-plugged
documentation was incorrect.




  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-10 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-24  8:33 Sean Neakums
2003-01-24 12:52 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-01-24 13:49   ` Sean Neakums
2003-01-24 22:00     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-04-13 21:10 ` Kevin Greiner
2003-04-13 21:18   ` Sean Neakums
2003-04-13 23:32     ` Kevin Greiner
2003-04-14  6:15   ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-18  6:31     ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-04-29  5:40       ` Kevin Greiner
2003-04-29 15:28         ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-30  2:12           ` Kevin Greiner
2003-05-01 10:57             ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-08 23:36         ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-10 14:43           ` Kevin Greiner [this message]
2003-05-10 16:08             ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-10 22:21               ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-11 23:20                 ` Kevin Greiner
2003-05-12  5:52                   ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-12 13:47                     ` Kevin Greiner
2003-05-12 18:46                       ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-12 20:37                         ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-14 11:07                           ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-14 17:15                             ` Kevin Greiner
2003-05-14 20:15                               ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-15  8:15                                 ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-12 15:51                     ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-12 18:49                       ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-13 12:31                         ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-10 17:35             ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-10 20:54               ` Gaute B Strokkenes
2003-05-12 15:49                 ` Kai Großjohann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=u7k8yx3od.fsf@xpediantsolutions.com \
    --to=kgreiner@xpediantsolutions.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).