Gnus 5.9->5.11

Gnus 5.9->5.11

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

The version of Gnus (based on Gnus 5.9) that's included in Emacs 21
has seemingly had quite a bit of work done to it.  Most of it's by
ShengHuo, which means that the relevant bits are (I think) also in
Oort, but are there other bits from that branch that should be
salvaged?

Anybody volunteering to go through the ChangeLog and pick out bits
that look they should be salvaged?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Gnus 5.9->5.11

[ShengHuo ZHU]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 724 bytes --]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> The version of Gnus (based on Gnus 5.9) that's included in Emacs 21
> has seemingly had quite a bit of work done to it.  Most of it's by
> ShengHuo, which means that the relevant bits are (I think) also in
> Oort, but are there other bits from that branch that should be
> salvaged?
>
> Anybody volunteering to go through the ChangeLog and pick out bits
> that look they should be salvaged?

I think I've sync'ed all changes except 

  1. some changes in mm-util.el conflict with those in Oort Gnus;
  2. the attached patch which is not compatible with early Emacs.

However, it would be nice if someone volunteers to doubly check and/or
solve those conflicts.

ShengHuo


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: message-split-line.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2064 bytes --]

Index: message.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/lisp/message.el,v
retrieving revision 6.286
diff -u -u -r6.286 message.el
--- message.el	2003/01/08 04:46:16	6.286
+++ message.el	2003/01/08 13:39:31
@@ -2041,6 +2041,7 @@
   (define-key message-mode-map "\C-c\C-z" 'message-kill-to-signature)
   (define-key message-mode-map "\M-\r" 'message-newline-and-reformat)
   ;;(define-key message-mode-map "\M-q" 'message-fill-paragraph)
+  (define-key message-mode-map [remap split-line]  'message-split-line)
 
   (define-key message-mode-map "\C-c\C-a" 'mml-attach-file)
 
@@ -4748,6 +4749,12 @@
     (goto-char (point-max))
     (widen)
     (forward-line 1)))
+
+(defun message-split-line ()
+  "Split current line, moving portion beyond point vertically down.
+If the current line has `message-yank-prefix', insert it on the new line."
+  (interactive "*")
+  (split-line message-yank-prefix))
 
 (defun message-fill-header (header value)
   (let ((begin (point))
Index: message.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/lisp/message.el,v
retrieving revision 6.286
diff -u -u -r6.286 message.el
--- message.el	2003/01/08 04:46:16	6.286
+++ message.el	2003/01/08 13:39:28
@@ -2041,6 +2041,7 @@
   (define-key message-mode-map "\C-c\C-z" 'message-kill-to-signature)
   (define-key message-mode-map "\M-\r" 'message-newline-and-reformat)
   ;;(define-key message-mode-map "\M-q" 'message-fill-paragraph)
+  (define-key message-mode-map [remap split-line]  'message-split-line)
 
   (define-key message-mode-map "\C-c\C-a" 'mml-attach-file)
 
@@ -4748,6 +4749,12 @@
     (goto-char (point-max))
     (widen)
     (forward-line 1)))
+
+(defun message-split-line ()
+  "Split current line, moving portion beyond point vertically down.
+If the current line has `message-yank-prefix', insert it on the new line."
+  (interactive "*")
+  (split-line message-yank-prefix))
 
 (defun message-fill-header (header value)
   (let ((begin (point))

Re: Gnus 5.9->5.11

[Andreas Fuchs]

Today, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
> The version of Gnus (based on Gnus 5.9) that's included in Emacs 21
> has seemingly had quite a bit of work done to it.  Most of it's by
> ShengHuo, which means that the relevant bits are (I think) also in
> Oort, but are there other bits from that branch that should be
> salvaged?

Hm, what's more important (from a user's point of view): is there a name
for the 5.11 release yet? A quick search on google and gmane revealed
nothing, only two general suggestions, "Nemesis" and "No", but no
discussion or any conclusion. So, what's the 5.11 naming theme going to
be?


-- 
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@acm.org>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs
irc.freenode.net's #emacs - online emacs advice from IRC addicts

Re: Gnus 5.9->5.11

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Andreas Fuchs <asf@void.at> writes:

> Hm, what's more important (from a user's point of view): is there a name
> for the 5.11 release yet? A quick search on google and gmane revealed
> nothing, only two general suggestions, "Nemesis" and "No", but no
> discussion or any conclusion. So, what's the 5.11 naming theme going to
> be?

I think "No Gnus" is good.  "No Gnus is good news".  Just think how
good that will look on a t-shirt.  With a logo consisting of the gnu
inside one of those red, round "forbidden" signs.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Gnus 5.9->5.11

[Xavier MAILLARD]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 886 bytes --]

<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
On 18 mar 2003, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:

>  Andreas Fuchs <asf@void.at> writes:
>  
> >  Hm, what's more important (from a user's point of view): is there a
> >  name for the 5.11 release yet? A quick search on google and gmane
> >  revealed nothing, only two general suggestions, "Nemesis" and "No",
> >  but no discussion or any conclusion. So, what's the 5.11 naming
> >  theme going to be?
>  
>  I think "No Gnus" is good.  "No Gnus is good news".  Just think how

Eh eh :) Love the idea.

>  good that will look on a t-shirt.  With a logo consisting of the gnu
>  inside one of those red, round "forbidden" signs.

Definitely a good idea :) "No Gnus is good news" sounds really good to
me. 

Maybe you should submit some kind of a poll where users will be able to
vote for terms ? 

zeDek
-- 
"NT == No Thanks"

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: Gnus 5.9->5.11

[Frank Schmitt]

Xavier MAILLARD <zedek@gnu-rox.org> writes:

> Definitely a good idea :) "No Gnus is good news" sounds really good to
> me. 
>
> Maybe you should submit some kind of a poll where users will be able to
> vote for terms ? 

What a pity, we still haven't nine Million brackets, only about 250.000
if my "count the brackets hack" worked right.

-- 
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.