* \201 gone again?
@ 2003-02-19 19:25 Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 20:38 ` Henrik Enberg
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2003-02-19 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
It seems that there was a fix for the \201 bug today or yesterday.
Or am I dreaming?
--
Hair today, gone tomorrow. (Tyree Glenn Jr)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: \201 gone again?
2003-02-19 19:25 \201 gone again? Kai Großjohann
@ 2003-02-19 20:38 ` Henrik Enberg
2003-02-19 20:43 ` Reiner Steib
2003-02-19 20:45 ` Frank Schmitt
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Henrik Enberg @ 2003-02-19 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> It seems that there was a fix for the \201 bug today or yesterday.
> Or am I dreaming?
They're gone for me too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: \201 gone again?
2003-02-19 19:25 \201 gone again? Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 20:38 ` Henrik Enberg
@ 2003-02-19 20:43 ` Reiner Steib
2003-02-20 9:59 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 20:45 ` Frank Schmitt
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Reiner Steib @ 2003-02-19 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, Feb 19 2003, Kai Großjohann wrote:
> It seems that there was a fix for the \201 bug today or yesterday.
> Or am I dreaming?
Handa-san (is this correct?) fixed it on Monday [1].
Kai, you should read emacs-devel when using CVS-Emacs, SCNR. ;-)
Bye, Reiner.
[1] <news:200302170035.JAA15102@etlken.m17n.org>
<URL: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/11690>
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: \201 gone again?
2003-02-19 19:25 \201 gone again? Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 20:38 ` Henrik Enberg
2003-02-19 20:43 ` Reiner Steib
@ 2003-02-19 20:45 ` Frank Schmitt
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frank Schmitt @ 2003-02-19 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> It seems that there was a fix for the \201 bug today or yesterday.
> Or am I dreaming?
Yes, see emacs-devel, there was a problem with mutibyte characters in
Emacs AFAIK. This seems to be the relevant change in Emacs which made
them disappear again:
2003-02-17 Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
* fns.c (string_to_multibyte): Always return a multibyte string.
--
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: \201 gone again?
2003-02-19 20:43 ` Reiner Steib
@ 2003-02-20 9:59 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2003-02-20 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:
> Kai, you should read emacs-devel when using CVS-Emacs, SCNR. ;-)
*blush*
Let me go and hide in a mouse hole somewhere.
--
A preposition is not a good thing to end a sentence with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-20 9:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-19 19:25 \201 gone again? Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 20:38 ` Henrik Enberg
2003-02-19 20:43 ` Reiner Steib
2003-02-20 9:59 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 20:45 ` Frank Schmitt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).