Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de>
Subject: Re: New summary part commands?
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:12:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <v9n0ksqgvg.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84of5bvxfq.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> (kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:39:05 +0100")

On Mon, Feb 17 2003, Kai Großjohann wrote:

> I've added a MIME/Multipart submenu in the summary buffers, but I'm
> afraid a number of commands there are less useful than they could
> be.  In particular, the *-part commands require a prefix arg, I
> think.  Users using the menu bar will probably surprised by this.
>
> Idea: Change the commands to read the part number from the minibuffer
> if no prefix arg is provided.
>
> Idea: For each command, make a (dynamic) submenu that lists the parts.
>
> What do you think?

Both ideas are nice.  I guess I'd prefer the later, if both are
feasible.

> Other ideas?

Is it possible to use the menus without prefix if the cursor is on a
specific part in the article buffer?  E.g. now, I can use `o' or `|'
on a part without giving the number of the part explicitly, if the
cursor is on the corresponding button.

BTW, for `gnus-summary-repair-multipart' I think we should add a
`y-or-no-p' because it may *destroy* an article (on writable back
ends), e.g. if the original article wasn't b0rked.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW   http://rsteib.home.pages.de/



  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-19 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-17 13:39 Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 18:12 ` Reiner Steib [this message]
2003-02-19 19:07   ` Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 20:20     ` Should gnus-summary-repair-multipart modify files on disk? (was: New summary part commands?) Reiner Steib
2003-02-20 11:53       ` Should gnus-summary-repair-multipart modify files on disk? Kai Großjohann
2003-02-19 20:43     ` New summary part commands? Reiner Steib
2003-02-20 10:27       ` Kai Großjohann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=v9n0ksqgvg.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de \
    --to=4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de \
    --cc=reiner.steib@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).