From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Paul Graham on fighting SPAM
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:57:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vafbs7uhj40.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m31y8qrfue.fsf@heechee.beld.net> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:57:45 -0400")
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> For new incoming spam, should we *also* run the spam analysis on a
> buffer that we think is spam, or is the spam analysis only for buffers
> that the user explicitly marks as spam?
I started to compose an answer saying yes. Then I thought about it
and deleted it and started to compose an answer saying no. Then I
changed my mind again... and then I figured that this is a
nontrivial question.
Maybe the folks over at comp.theory.info-retrieval know more about
this? There should be some experts hanging out there.
kai
--
A large number of young women don't trust men with beards. (BFBS Radio)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-22 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-16 17:10 Danny Siu
2002-08-17 19:43 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-19 5:44 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-19 8:53 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-21 1:14 ` news
2002-08-27 23:03 ` Nathan J. Williams
2002-08-19 10:50 ` Oliver Scholz
2002-08-19 11:06 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-19 14:55 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-19 17:09 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-19 14:12 ` Email filing Scott A Crosby
2002-09-05 16:00 ` clemens fischer
2002-12-29 22:35 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-08-19 9:23 ` Paul Graham on fighting SPAM Alex Schroeder
2002-08-19 11:29 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-19 15:09 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-19 16:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-19 22:22 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-20 7:42 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-20 12:00 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-22 2:21 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-22 16:32 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-22 16:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-22 17:57 ` Kai Großjohann [this message]
2002-08-22 18:42 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-22 19:59 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-22 20:07 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-22 20:54 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-26 21:55 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-26 23:19 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-28 6:40 ` Piers Cawley
2002-08-28 18:44 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-29 2:46 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-19 17:09 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-19 22:19 ` Alex Schroeder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vafbs7uhj40.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--to=kai.grossjohann@cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).