From: Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org>
Subject: Re: Paul Graham on fighting SPAM
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 04:21:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vg637hvh.fsf@emacswiki.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m37kilagei.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> Why not just mark spam messages that have been processed as expired?
> I doubt users will want to keep spam messages around :)
I still do not understand. Here is my problem again:
When the user leaves the summary buffer, there are five possibilities:
1. The message was new and the user thinks it is non-spam.
Call spam-stat-buffer-is-non-spam.
2. The message was new and the user thinks it is spam.
Call spam-stat-buffer-is-spam.
3. The message was old and marked as spam but the user no longer
thinks it is spam. Call spam-stat-buffer-change-to-non-spam.
4. The message was old and marked as non-spam but the user now thinks
it is spam. Call spam-stat-buffer-change-to-spam.
5. The message is old and its spam-status unchanged, or unread.
Nothing happens.
How to distinguish between these cases?
Note that I posted a new version to g.e.sources, which requires less
effort to build, can be updated on the fly, and has a tiny testing
infrastructure, plus test data by myself with a tiny set of mails.
Alex.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-22 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-16 17:10 Danny Siu
2002-08-17 19:43 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-19 5:44 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-19 8:53 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-21 1:14 ` news
2002-08-27 23:03 ` Nathan J. Williams
2002-08-19 10:50 ` Oliver Scholz
2002-08-19 11:06 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-19 14:55 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-19 17:09 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-19 14:12 ` Email filing Scott A Crosby
2002-09-05 16:00 ` clemens fischer
2002-12-29 22:35 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-08-19 9:23 ` Paul Graham on fighting SPAM Alex Schroeder
2002-08-19 11:29 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-19 15:09 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-19 16:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-19 22:22 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-20 7:42 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-20 12:00 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-22 2:21 ` Alex Schroeder [this message]
2002-08-22 16:32 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-22 16:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-22 17:57 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-22 18:42 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-22 19:59 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-22 20:07 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-22 20:54 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-26 21:55 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-26 23:19 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-28 6:40 ` Piers Cawley
2002-08-28 18:44 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-29 2:46 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-19 17:09 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-19 22:19 ` Alex Schroeder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vg637hvh.fsf@emacswiki.org \
--to=alex@emacswiki.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).