From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)
Subject: Re: possible strange idea about hierarchical lists
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 09:55:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vafbshe59mw.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3bsheubq6.fsf@onyx.nimbus.northernlight.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 04 Dec 2001 12:38:41 -0500")
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@northernlight.com> writes:
> You are right. It's faster and easier (for implementer and user) to
> use a 2-level list. But is anyone except me interested in it?
I think the feature is too cool to be comprehended easily. Just go
ahead and add it, and in ten years, when people have become wiser,
they will thank you for it :-)
Or it's just me who is dimwitted and has problems seeing the
benefits... Anyhow, some thinking about it indicates a high coolness
factor.
kai
--
Simplification good! Oversimplification bad! (Larry Wall)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-05 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-04 16:59 Ted Zlatanov
2001-12-04 17:31 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-12-04 17:28 ` Ted Zlatanov
2001-12-04 17:44 ` Paul Jarc
2001-12-04 17:38 ` Ted Zlatanov
2001-12-05 8:55 ` Kai Großjohann [this message]
2001-12-05 16:52 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-12-07 14:09 ` Ted Zlatanov
2001-12-29 2:02 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-16 19:33 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-01-16 20:12 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-01-18 9:18 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-31 21:40 ` Paul Jarc
2002-02-01 22:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-02-02 3:37 ` Paul Jarc
2002-02-25 23:04 ` [patch] hierarchical lists in message.el Ted Zlatanov
2002-02-25 23:22 ` Paul Jarc
2002-02-26 11:40 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-02-26 11:40 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-02-25 23:22 ` Paul Jarc
2002-03-01 21:23 ` Paul Jarc
2002-03-01 21:23 ` Paul Jarc
2002-03-04 17:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-03-04 18:11 ` Paul Jarc
2002-03-04 18:11 ` Paul Jarc
2002-03-04 17:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-02-25 23:04 ` Ted Zlatanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vafbshe59mw.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--to=kai.grossjohann@cs.uni-dortmund.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).