Re: [Edbrowse-dev] script in tree of document.written elements?

[Kevin Carhart <kevin@carhart.net>]

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Karl Dahlke wrote:

> It was not at all clear to me, is not at all clear to me, where to put the objects that result from document.write.
> innerHTML is obvious, document.write isnot.

Thank you for wrangling it in the first place.  I think it's 
semi-deprecated or Considered Harmful.  There are various articles 
frowning on it.  So it's one of those annoying constructs that shouldn't 
be used, but here it is in the tests itself.

Okay.  I just opened hello.html in firefox and firebug.  It puts the P 
immediately after the script.  The P has parentNode body.  <Script> is 
not part of its tree branch.

I'm also in acid3.acidtests.org in firebug right now to verify with this.
I'm opening up the document.forms.  There is only one and it is one of 
those tags that is part of the document.write inside of the last script, 
so I think it's an illustrative piece of evidence and it's easy to make 
sure you're on the element you want to be on.

document.form[0].parentNode is map, and
document.form[0].parentNode.parentNode is body

> I thought they should parse under the script that does the 
> document.write, that is reasonable, rational, but not based on any spec 
> or anything.

I think that's right.  And with script omitted from their descendancy 
trail/tree branch.  Could this actually be tidy-related?

This is going to be good.