From: Nicolai Kraus <nicolai.kraus@gmail.com>
To: Jasper Hugunin <jasperh@cs.washington.edu>,
HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Looking for a reference that HITs are a strict extension of HoTT
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 07:14:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24a741c1-a100-22cc-ccc8-2defdfb3a08d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGTS-a9Uc6Wxxz-BmBDCovbq6YrV2D0HPmqNp_shQC87hH4dSA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2238 bytes --]
Hi Jasper,
here's an argument: Without HITs, it's consistent to assume that every
type in U_n is an n-type (since, as you said, all type formers preserve
h-level). But with HIT's, consider the type
Sigma (k: Nat), S^k.
This is not a k-type for any k since the k-th fundamental group is
nontrivial if you choose the base point correctly (see Licata-Brunerie
CPP 2013).
Remarks: 1. If we knew that S^2 is not a k-type for any k, then this
would work as well for the second step, but as you said, we don't know
so far whether this can be shown in HoTT.
2. For more general universe hierarchies than the one you use, for
example indexed over omega+1 or indexed over any poset of arbitrary
height, my argument won't work; I can't think of a proof for that
situation off the top of my head.
Nicolai
On 07/09/18 04:56, Jasper Hugunin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Many ways of doing HoTT (Coq + Univalence Axiom, Cubical Type Theory)
> make sense without including support for defining Higher Inductive
> Types. The possibility of defining small, closed types which are not
> hsets (like the circle) or have infinite h-level (like the 2-sphere,
> conjectured?) makes constructing HITs from other types seem difficult,
> since all the type formers except universes preserve h-level.
>
> Does anyone know a proof that it is impossible to construct some HITs
> from basic type formers (say 0, 1, 2, Sigma, Pi, W, and a hierarchy of
> univalent universes U_n), up to equivalence?
>
> - Jasper Hugunin
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3334 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-07 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 3:56 Jasper Hugunin
2018-09-07 6:14 ` Nicolai Kraus [this message]
2018-09-07 6:30 ` Nicolai Kraus
2018-09-07 10:30 ` Nicolai Kraus
2018-09-07 12:38 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24a741c1-a100-22cc-ccc8-2defdfb3a08d@gmail.com \
--to=nicolai.kraus@gmail.com \
--cc=HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jasperh@cs.washington.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).