Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Altenkirch <Thorsten.Altenkirch@nottingham.ac.uk>
To: Jasper Hugunin <jasperh@cs.washington.edu>,
	"homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com"
	<homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Looking for a reference that HITs are a strict extension of HoTT
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:38:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7EB528F2-E403-4706-B89B-6A46C7176A7D@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGTS-a9Uc6Wxxz-BmBDCovbq6YrV2D0HPmqNp_shQC87hH4dSA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2714 bytes --]

Don’t you need at least some sort of quotients? How do you define the Cauchy Reals otherwise?

Ok using resizing (not recommended) you can encode quotients (as in a topos).

However quotients are not enough.

In https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07088,  Lumsdaine and Shulman Section 9 given an example based on a construction by Blass which shows that there are QITs (set truncated HITs) that are not definable using quotients.

I say “likely” because I think that their construction doesn’t allow for univalence. On the other hand I don’t see a way how to define their counterexample using univalence either.

Thorsten

From: <homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Jasper Hugunin <jasperh@cs.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, 7 September 2018 at 04:56
To: "homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com" <homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [HoTT] Looking for a reference that HITs are a strict extension of HoTT

Hello all,

Many ways of doing HoTT (Coq + Univalence Axiom, Cubical Type Theory) make sense without including support for defining Higher Inductive Types. The possibility of defining small, closed types which are not hsets (like the circle) or have infinite h-level (like the 2-sphere, conjectured?) makes constructing HITs from other types seem difficult, since all the type formers except universes preserve h-level.

Does anyone know a proof that it is impossible to construct some HITs from basic type formers (say 0, 1, 2, Sigma, Pi, W, and a hierarchy of univalent universes U_n), up to equivalence?

- Jasper Hugunin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
attachment. 

Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
where permitted by law.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7506 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07  3:56 Jasper Hugunin
2018-09-07  6:14 ` Nicolai Kraus
2018-09-07  6:30   ` Nicolai Kraus
2018-09-07 10:30     ` Nicolai Kraus
2018-09-07 12:38 ` Thorsten Altenkirch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7EB528F2-E403-4706-B89B-6A46C7176A7D@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk \
    --to=thorsten.altenkirch@nottingham.ac.uk \
    --cc=homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=jasperh@cs.washington.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).