Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martín Hötzel Escardó" <"escardo..."@gmail.com>
To: Homotopy Type Theory <HomotopyT...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Voevodsky obituary in Nature
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:11:58 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <380b537f-f78f-4bbb-9357-c55e8cd60b47@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa3b9780-31b2-44d6-8a39-e771e8615ff1@googlegroups.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2167 bytes --]



On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 22:49:30 UTC, Martín Hötzel Escardó wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:50:24 UTC, Dimitris Tsementzis wrote:
>>
>> Dan,
>>
>> It is an interesting idea to refer to univalence as a “mechanism” rather 
>> than an “axiom”.
>>
>> Even if you did it for expository reasons, I believe that in certain 
>> contexts it is a good phrase to adopt.
>>
>
> I very much like this way of expression, too, even though univalence 
> became a mechanism for the first time with cubicaltt.
>
> Nevertheless, although Vladimir certainly didn't have a mechanism for 
> univalence, he envisioned its possibility, and even formulated a conjecture 
> that is still unsettled, namely that if univalence implies that there is a 
> *number* n:N with a property P(n), then we can find, metatheoretically, 
> using an algorithm, a *numeral* n':N (a closed term of type N) and a proof 
> that univalence implies P(n'). 
>

The conjecture said that we can find a numeral n':N and a proof that 
univalence implies n=n' . 

Here is what he actually conjectured:

"
Conjecture 1 There is a terminating algorithm which for any term nn of type 
nat constructed
with the use of the univalence axiom outputs a pair (nn 0 , pf ) where nn 0 
is a term of type nat
constructed without the use of the univalence axiom and pf is a term of 
type paths nat nn nn 0 (i.e.
a proof that nn 0 = nn). The term pf may use the univalence axiom.
"
 http://www.math.ias.edu/vladimir/files/univalent_foundations_project.pdf

Martin

No mechanism for univalence can currently provide that, as far as I know.
>
> Martin 
>  
>
>>
>> Dimitris
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2017, at 16:40, Daniel R. Grayson <daniel...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> See https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-05477-9
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4036 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-07 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-07 21:40 Daniel R. Grayson
2017-11-07 21:51 ` [HoTT] " Dimitris Tsementzis
2017-11-07 22:49   ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2017-11-07 23:11     ` Martín Hötzel Escardó [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=380b537f-f78f-4bbb-9357-c55e8cd60b47@googlegroups.com \
    --to="escardo..."@gmail.com \
    --cc="HomotopyT..."@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).