Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Escardo <escardo...@googlemail.com>
To: "HomotopyT...@googlegroups.com" <HomotopyT...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] new preprint available
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:52:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60244690-d027-1a0b-2796-3e898028b4b2@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C79A5055-7559-4E00-8217-E87C703E28FF@chalmers.se>

On 11/01/17 08:58, Thierry Coquand wrote:
>
>  A new preprint is available on arXiv
>
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.02571
>
> where we present a stack semantics of type theory, and use it to
> show that countable choice is not provable in dependent type theory
> with one univalent universe and propositional truncation.

Nice. And useful to know.

I wonder whether your model, or a suitable adaptation, can prove
something stronger, namely that a weakening of countable choice is
already not provable. (We can discuss in another opportunity why this is
interesting and how it arises.)

The weakening is

    ((n:N) -> || A n + B ||) -> || (n:N) -> A n + B ||

where A n is a decidable proposition and B is a set.

(Actually, the further weakening in which B is an arbitrary subset of
the Cantor type (N->2) is also interesting. It would also be interesting
to know whether it is provable. I suspect it isn't.)

We know that countable choice is not provable from excluded middle.

But the above instance is. (And much less than excluded middle is enough.)

Best,
Martin


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-14 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-11  8:58 Thierry Coquand
2017-01-14 19:52 ` Martin Escardo [this message]
2017-01-16 10:35   ` [HoTT] " Martin Escardo
2017-01-16 14:12   ` Andrew Swan
2017-01-16 14:31     ` Thierry Coquand
2017-01-19 21:49       ` Martin Escardo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60244690-d027-1a0b-2796-3e898028b4b2@googlemail.com \
    --to="escardo..."@googlemail.com \
    --cc="HomotopyT..."@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).