Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Oliveri <atmacen@gmail.com>
To: Homotopy Type Theory <HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [HoTT] Equality in the Model Type Framework
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 20:38:47 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67d3932e-aa85-41dd-9845-db62e2472772@googlegroups.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1431 bytes --]

I saw Dan Licata's Hausdorf talks about the framework for modal type 
systems that he, Mike Shulman, and Mitchell Riley are working on.

As I understand it, a "mode theory" in this framework specifies a 
judgmental structure, and the bold F and U type constructors provide 
certain type constructors for each judgmental structure generically. The 
resulting type systems correspond to certain doctrines, and each system can 
be used to specify theories for structured categories of the corresponding 
doctrine.

Neat. Except... theories usually involve equality. What equality is this, 
on the type theory side? In the case of simple type systems, I guess it can 
only be judgmental equality. But what about with dependent type systems? 
What's the plan?

If dependently-typed theories could use judgmental equality in axioms, and 
if one universe (without type constructors) was added to the framework, it 
seems like each mode theory would yield a system analogous to Martin-Löf's 
logical framework (MLLF), so a full constructive type theory could be 
specified at the theory level. This sounds nice.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1627 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2018-07-03  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03  3:38 Matt Oliveri [this message]
2018-07-03 16:17 ` [HoTT] " Matt Oliveri
2018-07-04  4:49 ` [HoTT] " Michael Shulman
2018-07-04 18:11   ` Matt Oliveri
2018-07-05  4:00     ` Michael Shulman
2018-07-05  5:59       ` Matt Oliveri
2018-07-05 14:31         ` Michael Shulman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67d3932e-aa85-41dd-9845-db62e2472772@googlegroups.com \
    --to=atmacen@gmail.com \
    --cc=HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).