From: Steve Awodey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Thomas Streicher <email@example.com>
Cc: "Michael Shulman" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
"Anders MÃ¶rtberg" <email@example.com>,
"Homotopy Type Theory" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] A unifying cartesian cubical type theory
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 17:27:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA9EE7F9-87BD-4511-B6D4-891B946CD1B3@cmu.edu> (raw)
> On Feb 16, 2019, at 2:51 PM, Thomas Streicher <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> I think the idea is that the model structure is constructed / proved using
>>> ideas from type theory (like univalence), rather than that it is a model
>>> of type theory. But I agree that the terminology is confusing.
>>> The methodology is, I think, due to Christian Sattler ??? so maybe Sattler
>>> model structure is more appropriate?
>> When the interval is fixed one might speak of minimal Cisinski model
>> structure since it is the one with the fewest weak equivalences.
>> Of course, Sattler studied them a lot so it's good name either.
> Well, Coquand-Sattler might be better because it was first used in the
> [CCHM] paper. From the many anodyne monos of the test model structure
> one took just those which were syntactically convenient.
I don’t want to minimize the importance of the work on cubical type theory
— which I believe is very great — but it has focussed on building models of type theory
directly, often within other type theories, rather than on building Quillen model categories.
To be sure, many ideas, and some terminology, from model category theory are used,
but without showing or even claiming that there is a Quillen model structure.
> But, as far as I know the test model structure also gives rise to a
> model of cubical TT because its more restrictive class off fibrations
> suffices for interpreting sytax.
has it been shown that the test model structure interprets Pi types, universes, and univalence?
>> Unfortunately, we don't know when minimal and test model structure concide.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheoryfirstname.lastname@example.org.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheoryemail@example.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-16 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 19:04 Anders Mortberg
2019-02-14 20:06 ` Andrew Pitts
2019-02-15 15:38 ` Anders Mörtberg
2019-02-15 8:16 ` Bas Spitters
2019-02-15 16:32 ` Anders Mörtberg
2019-02-16 0:01 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-16 0:14 ` Steve Awodey
2019-02-16 12:30 ` streicher
2019-02-16 19:51 ` Thomas Streicher
2019-02-16 22:27 ` Steve Awodey [this message]
2019-02-17 9:43 ` Thomas Streicher
2019-02-17 14:14 ` Licata, Dan
2019-02-16 21:58 ` Richard Williamson
2019-02-17 9:15 ` Thomas Streicher
2019-02-17 13:49 ` Richard Williamson
2019-02-18 14:05 ` [HoTT] " Andrew Swan
2019-02-18 15:31 ` Anders Mörtberg
2019-06-16 16:04 ` Anders Mörtberg
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).