Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine <p.l.lu...@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Streicher <stre...@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: Michael Shulman <shu...@sandiego.edu>,
	 "HomotopyT...@googlegroups.com" <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Categories with 2-families
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 21:39:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAkwb-kBBk3=Lzmb-sn47N8mtXZUe6Y=3pQChFcnYXP=d2pdRg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180307203003.GA11083@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 668 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Thomas Streicher <
stre...@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:

> But if you specialize the interpretation of type theory in
> comprehension categories to discrete ones you wan't be able to
> interpret terms (since the latter are interpreted as morphism in the
> fibers, namely as sections).


To clarify, by “discrete comprehension categories” I mean the ones Mike was
talking about, i.e. where the fibration of types is a discrete fibration; I
don’t mean that the base category is discrete.  So there’s no problem here
— terms are still interpreted as sections of dependent projections, just as
usual.

–p.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1031 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-07 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-05 21:29 Michael Shulman
2018-03-07 17:09 ` [HoTT] " Thomas Streicher
2018-03-07 20:15   ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
2018-03-07 20:30     ` Thomas Streicher
2018-03-07 20:39       ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine [this message]
2018-03-07 21:01         ` Thomas Streicher
2018-03-07 22:16           ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
2018-03-08 10:11             ` Thomas Streicher
2018-03-07 21:20       ` Michael Shulman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAkwb-kBBk3=Lzmb-sn47N8mtXZUe6Y=3pQChFcnYXP=d2pdRg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to="p.l.lu..."@gmail.com \
    --cc="homotopyt..."@googlegroups.com \
    --cc="shu..."@sandiego.edu \
    --cc="stre..."@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).