From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)
Subject: Re: ancient articles
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:53:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874qemjmbj.fsf@koldfront.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vfu0mmq2m0.fsf@rpc71.cs.man.ac.uk>
On 04 Apr 2005 11:04:55 +0100, Phillip wrote:
Adam> If so, the answer is right there in the info-node that Reiner
Adam> Steib quoted: an article is ancient if it has been marked read
Adam> in a previous session (not the current session). Simple as that.
Adam> Sorry if I misunderstood you and the above was obvious.
> Then I don't understand what is happening.
> I use auto-expiry on my main mail box, moving stuff to an old mail
> box after 30 days.
> If I look at my mail box now, I have a pile of messages marked as
> "O", then a set of messages marked as "!" (ticked, which I have
> marked so that they stay around). And then messages marked as "E" or
> "EA".
> If I look at the dates, those marked E (expired) are all less than
> 30 days old. The ones marked as "O" can be much older. They are
> certainly not all of my old mail messages, most of which have
> expired correctly.
> None of which seems to relate to messages read in previous sessions
> (presumably a session being an gnus/emacs restart).
I don't think the 'O' interacts with expiry in any way, but I'm
certainly not an expiry-expert in any way (I don't use it at home, I
use it casually at work, and I've never used auto-expire).
When investigating why some articles older than 30 days aren't expired
I would ignore the 'O', if I were you, I think.
Hopefully someone with better understanding of this can jump in and
enlighten things.
Best regards,
Adam
--
"Vilken sanning, Måns, är sann?" Adam Sjøgren
asjo@koldfront.dk
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-04 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-31 14:03 Phillip Lord
2005-03-31 15:46 ` Christian Dietrich
2005-03-31 18:11 ` Phillip Lord
2005-04-01 16:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2005-03-31 16:18 ` Reiner Steib
2005-03-31 18:13 ` Phillip Lord
2005-03-31 19:31 ` Reiner Steib
2005-04-04 9:48 ` Phillip Lord
2005-03-31 21:07 ` Adam Sjøgren
2005-04-04 10:04 ` Phillip Lord
2005-04-04 20:53 ` Adam Sjøgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874qemjmbj.fsf@koldfront.dk \
--to=asjo@koldfront.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).