Re: How to keep spam.el from re-registering messages?

Re: How to keep spam.el from re-registering messages?

[Svend Tollak Munkejord]

On 2004-04-06, Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, stm+direct_reply@bacchus.pvv.org wrote:
>
>> I found the article <4n1xo35zp7.fsf@lifelogs.com> where Ted Zlatanov
>> recommends to change
>>
>> (changed-articles (gnus-set-difference old-articles new-articles)))
>>
>> to
>>
>> (changed-articles (gnus-set-difference new-articles old-articles)))
>>
>> in spam.el. I did this and recompiled Gnus (5.10.6). It still does
>> not work
>
> In CVS, I switched from gnus-set-difference to spam-set-difference,
> which provides what I consider a better set difference operation.  I
> think you can use the CVS spam.el even though other pieces have been
> added.  You should take a look at the differences between the CVS
> spam.el and the 5.10.6 version and see for yourself.  Let me know if
> you need help with this.

I haven't looked at the code, but I have installed the current gnus
snapshot at a test account. Still, messages seems to be registered multiple
times: Ham messages are registered every time I exit the ham group, if I
have looked at them, i.e. if they are marked `R'. Spam messages, marked
`$', are registered every time I exit the spam group. Shouldn't they only
be registered once?

Regards,
-- 
Svend Tollak Munkejord 

Re: How to keep spam.el from re-registering messages?

[Svend Tollak Munkejord]

On 2004-04-13, Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, stm+direct_reply@bacchus.pvv.org wrote:
>
>> I haven't looked at the code, but I have installed the current gnus
>> snapshot at a test account. Still, messages seems to be registered
>> multiple times: Ham messages are registered every time I exit the
>> ham group, if I have looked at them, i.e. if they are marked
>> `R'. Spam messages, marked `$', are registered every time I exit the
>> spam group. Shouldn't they only be registered once?
>
> Turn up your gnus-verbose to 10, and look at the log.  Also,
> spam-log-processing-to-registry needs to be turned on.
>
> If you can send me a trace of the problem from the *Messages* buffer,
> that would be very helpful.

OK, I sent it to you by e-mail.

Regards,
-- 
Svend Tollak Munkejord