Re: gnus and enigmail

[Vincent Bernat <vince@khabale.org>]

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du samedi 22 novembre
2003, vers 23:28, Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> disait:

>>>> Evolution inverts MIME decoding and GPG signing so signatures appear
>>>> as bad. Is there a way to tell Gnus to invert MIME decoding and GPG
>>>> checking to check this kind of signatures as well ?
>> 
>>> Not right now, I think.  The inline PGP needs an overhaul.  During
>>> sending, it should warn the user about all possible dangers of using
>>> QP, and allow the user to chose how to send it (there are three
>>> different ways of sending inline PGP with QP).  During receiving, it
>>> should try all three different ways before giving up.
>> 
>> Is it easy to do the receiving part ?

> Boring work, but can be done.

I have just check a message posted with Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 and
they now sign correctly outgoing messages. Since I do not know any
other clients messing with that, it should be useless to start coding
alternate decodings.
-- 
panic("huh?\n");
	2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c