From: Reiner Herrmann <reiner@reiner-h.de>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: realpath after chroot
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 19:49:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191008174955.GI8814@reiner-h.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191008173850.GA16318@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1188 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 01:38:50PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > I noticed that realpath is no longer working after chroot is called.
>
> This is a documented requirement:
>
[...]
>
> Source: https://www.musl-libc.org/doc/1.0.0/manual.html
>
> It's been discussed in more depth in other places. Basically, Linux
> makes it impossible to do some things needed for a fully working
> C/POSIX implementation without /proc, so we have to treat it as a
> "requirement". Some subset of functionality works without it, but no
> formal specification of exactly what works is made by musl.
>
> For realpath, indeed it can be implemented in userspace without /proc,
> and it may be desirable to do so as a fallback. It might make sense to
> do an analysis of "how essential" /proc still is on reasonably recent
> kernels; if the need for it is isolated to dynamic linker stuff (rpath
> origin, etc.) then it might make a lot of sense to formalize that
> /proc is only mandatory for certain things.
Interesting, thank you for the explanation.
For a daemon that chroots somewhere I then need to either mount proc
into the chroot or avoid realpath.
Regards,
Reiner
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-08 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-08 17:24 Reiner Herrmann
2019-10-08 17:38 ` Rich Felker
2019-10-08 17:49 ` Reiner Herrmann [this message]
2019-10-08 19:56 ` Markus Wichmann
2019-10-08 21:10 ` Rich Felker
2019-10-09 3:47 ` Markus Wichmann
2019-10-09 11:45 ` Rich Felker
2019-10-09 16:00 ` Markus Wichmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191008174955.GI8814@reiner-h.de \
--to=reiner@reiner-h.de \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).