Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.9?]

Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.9?]

[Gregor Richards]

Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2012Q4 on 
musl 0.9.9, with patches from 
http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision 5a4bed4ba3aa.

Attempted:    10865
Deps failed:    3456
Build tried:    7409
Build failed:    1056
Tests failed:    366
Success:    5987 (80.8071%)

Breakdown:
http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q4-5a4bed4ba3aa-musl-0.9.9-breakdown.txt?attredirects=0&d=1 
or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results (once the wiki is working 
and I can update it)
Archive:
http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q4-5a4bed4ba3aa-musl-0.9.9.tar.gz?attredirects=0&d=1


Notes:

In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means 
tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure.

Two reversions from last time:
  * I cheated to make the current version of glib2 build, because 
without it, pretty much everything else fails spuriously. It had a 
problem with resolver code, I just stubbed it out to get these results. 
We've already devised a correct fix, which should go into musl if it's 
not already there, but is not present in these results.
  * The new version of Ruby has (yet again!) cases of using #if 
__linux__ as #if __GLIBC__. I'll have to patch those up again. This 
broke a few hundred packages since anything that needed Ruby didn't build.

If you have patches to make other packages build, please report them on 
the musl-pkgsrc-patches issue tracker: 
https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches/issues .

As with all of my repositories, musl-pkgsrc-patches is also available 
via git: http://github.com/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches .

If you reply to this email, please reply-all. (I am not presently 
subscribed to this mailing list, as it has no digest option.)

With valediction,
  - Gregor Richards