* How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters?
@ 2023-03-12 13:24 Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
2023-03-13 21:39 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context @ 2023-03-12 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ntg-context mailing list; +Cc: Bruce Horrocks
I have an existing macro that I'd like to extend.
The current definition is \define[3]\mycommand{...} which I'd like to extend to take an optional 4th parameter plus an optional setup parameter.
Thus I currently invoke it as:
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
and I'd like to be able to extend it so that any of the following can be used:
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
or
\mycommand[ee]{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd} % if this is more the ConTeXt way
where {dd} is the optional extra parameter and, if it is present, then [ee] can also be optionally added (because it controls how {dd} is printed).
If it helps, the actual body of the macro can easily be a call to Lua so it's fine if the function takes 5 params where 4 and 5 can be nil or empty strings.
I've trawled through syst-aux.mkiv but it only covers optional numbers of [ ] or { } but not combinations of both (which given the vast numbers of combinations is perhaps not surprising!). Have I missed something obvious that would help me?
Regards,
—
Bruce Horrocks
Hampshire, UK
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters?
2023-03-12 13:24 How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters? Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
@ 2023-03-13 21:39 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2023-03-14 2:08 ` Alan Braslau via ntg-context
2023-03-15 1:27 ` Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen via ntg-context @ 2023-03-13 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context; +Cc: Hans Hagen
On 3/12/2023 2:24 PM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote:
> I have an existing macro that I'd like to extend.
>
> The current definition is \define[3]\mycommand{...} which I'd like to extend to take an optional 4th parameter plus an optional setup parameter.
>
> Thus I currently invoke it as:
>
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
>
> and I'd like to be able to extend it so that any of the following can be used:
>
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
>
> or
>
> \mycommand[ee]{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd} % if this is more the ConTeXt way
>
> where {dd} is the optional extra parameter and, if it is present, then [ee] can also be optionally added (because it controls how {dd} is printed).
>
> If it helps, the actual body of the macro can easily be a call to Lua so it's fine if the function takes 5 params where 4 and 5 can be nil or empty strings.
>
> I've trawled through syst-aux.mkiv but it only covers optional numbers of [ ] or { } but not combinations of both (which given the vast numbers of combinations is perhaps not surprising!). Have I missed something obvious that would help me?
So, four optional with mandate {} plus a fallback to an optional []
\starttext
\tolerant\def\mycommand#=#=#=#=#:[#5]%
{\ifparameter#1\or(1:#1)\fi
\ifparameter#2\or(2:#2)\fi
\ifparameter#3\or(3:#3)\fi
\ifparameter#4\or(4:#4)\fi
\ifparameter#5\or[5:#5]\fi}
\startbuffer
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\startlines \getbuffer \stoplines
\stoptext
I'm not saying that it's the best solution, you can add \protected in
front of the \def if needed.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters?
2023-03-13 21:39 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
@ 2023-03-14 2:08 ` Alan Braslau via ntg-context
2023-03-15 1:32 ` Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
2023-03-15 1:27 ` Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alan Braslau via ntg-context @ 2023-03-14 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context; +Cc: Alan Braslau
Designating "optional" parameters within [...] is a LaTeX notion.
ConTeXt handles parameters differently.
Alan
> > and I'd like to be able to extend it so that any of the following
> > can be used:
> >
> > \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
> > \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
> > \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
> >
> > or
> >
> > \mycommand[ee]{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd} % if this is more the ConTeXt way
> >
> > where {dd} is the optional extra parameter and, if it is present,
> > then [ee] can also be optionally added (because it controls how
> > {dd} is printed).
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters?
2023-03-13 21:39 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2023-03-14 2:08 ` Alan Braslau via ntg-context
@ 2023-03-15 1:27 ` Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context @ 2023-03-15 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ntg-context mailing list; +Cc: Bruce Horrocks
> On 13 Mar 2023, at 21:39, Hans Hagen via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
>
> On 3/12/2023 2:24 PM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote:
>> I have an existing macro that I'd like to extend.
>> The current definition is \define[3]\mycommand{...} which I'd like to extend to take an optional 4th parameter plus an optional setup parameter.
>> Thus I currently invoke it as:
>> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
>> and I'd like to be able to extend it so that any of the following can be used:
>> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
>> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
>> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
>> or
>> \mycommand[ee]{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd} % if this is more the ConTeXt way
>> where {dd} is the optional extra parameter and, if it is present, then [ee] can also be optionally added (because it controls how {dd} is printed).
>> If it helps, the actual body of the macro can easily be a call to Lua so it's fine if the function takes 5 params where 4 and 5 can be nil or empty strings.
>> I've trawled through syst-aux.mkiv but it only covers optional numbers of [ ] or { } but not combinations of both (which given the vast numbers of combinations is perhaps not surprising!). Have I missed something obvious that would help me?
> So, four optional with mandate {} plus a fallback to an optional []
>
> \starttext
>
> \tolerant\def\mycommand#=#=#=#=#:[#5]%
> {\ifparameter#1\or(1:#1)\fi
> \ifparameter#2\or(2:#2)\fi
> \ifparameter#3\or(3:#3)\fi
> \ifparameter#4\or(4:#4)\fi
> \ifparameter#5\or[5:#5]\fi}
>
> \startbuffer
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
> \stopbuffer
>
> \typebuffer
>
> \startlines \getbuffer \stoplines
>
> \stoptext
>
> I'm not saying that it's the best solution, you can add \protected in front of the \def if needed.
>
> Hans
Thanks Hans,
This works well. I'll try and add something to the Wiki but I don't understand how #: does what it does.
Regards,
—
Bruce Horrocks
Hampshire, UK
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters?
2023-03-14 2:08 ` Alan Braslau via ntg-context
@ 2023-03-15 1:32 ` Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context @ 2023-03-15 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ntg-context mailing list; +Cc: Bruce Horrocks
> On 14 Mar 2023, at 02:08, Alan Braslau via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
>
> Designating "optional" parameters within [...] is a LaTeX notion.
> ConTeXt handles parameters differently.
>
> Alan
Thanks Alan but I've never used LaTeX so I've no idea what the philosophical differences are.
I wanted three mandatory and two optional params. One of those optional params is not typeset so I assumed it should be [ ] delimited and not { }.
>
>>> and I'd like to be able to extend it so that any of the following
>>> can be used:
>>>
>>> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}
>>> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}
>>> \mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd}[ee]
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> \mycommand[ee]{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd} % if this is more the ConTeXt way
>>>
>>> where {dd} is the optional extra parameter and, if it is present,
>>> then [ee] can also be optionally added (because it controls how
>>> {dd} is printed).
—
Bruce Horrocks
Hampshire, UK
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-15 1:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-12 13:24 How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters? Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
2023-03-13 21:39 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2023-03-14 2:08 ` Alan Braslau via ntg-context
2023-03-15 1:32 ` Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
2023-03-15 1:27 ` Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).