[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

[Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>]

On 4/17/2024 8:32 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 16. Apr 2024, at 21:56, Peter Hopcroft via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 17/04/2024, at 7:11 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm <texml@fiee.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> In my poster (still WIP) I wrote:
>>> …
>>
>> Excellent
> 
> No, I must admit I don’t like the first two paragraphs. The question is “what is ConTeXt,” and the answer is “we’re not LaTeX.” And why “infamous”?
I agree. It sounds the same as "we're not msword" or "we're not google 
docs". (In the end the only thing that latex and context have in common 
is that they use the tex language / ecosystem.)

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________