* markings in lmtx and luatex
@ 2020-11-23 12:50 Thomas A. Schmitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2020-11-23 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi all,
something has changed in the way markings are handled. Consider the
following example:
\definemarking[Section]
\setupheadertexts[{\getmarking[Section][top]–\getmarking[Section][bottom]}]
\starttext
A\marking[Section]{A}
B\marking[Section]{B}
C\marking[Section]{C}
\page
D\marking[Section]{D}
E\marking[Section]{E}
F\marking[Section]{F}
\page
G\marking[Section]{G}
H\marking[Section]{H}
I\marking[Section]{I}
\stoptext
Compiled with luatex, the result is not quite as expected, but at least
it goes into the right direction. Compiled with lmtx, "top" and "bottom"
are always identical. Something appears to be amiss here.
Best wishes
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-11-23 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-23 12:50 markings in lmtx and luatex Thomas A. Schmitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).