From: jbf via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Cc: jbf <roma83537@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] adjustment to my local footnotes problem
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 07:38:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd69fd53-37f6-ab75-b877-0c2d7015ce1b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe28bdec-25a0-cd43-bde6-806879c69078@fiee.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2543 bytes --]
I tried all those Hraban, unsuccessfully, but finally 'happened' upon a
solution by trying whitespace instead in the setups. Except that I had
read somewhere in the mailing list (Pablo I think) that I would need to
use \directsetup. I don't actually understand why, have never been sure
about what \directsetup does, but there's no doubt it works in this
case! So the following has done what I needed:
\startsetups[setups:footnotes]
\setupwhitespace[.01em]
\stopsetups
\setupnote[before=\directsetup{setups:footnotes}]
Julian
On 23/4/23 20:34, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
> Am 23.04.23 um 09:21 schrieb jbf via ntg-context:
>> I realise that I should have been talking about the space between
>> local footnotes, rather than interlinespace (previous email on this
>> issue), but my basic problem still stands. My efforts to influence
>> the space between footnotes placed locally is to no avail so far.
>>
>> I assume it is \setupnote (rather than \setupnotation, my earlier
>> mistake) where I would need to somehow influence distance between
>> footnotes which is currently too large. I have tried
>> \setupnote[before={\blank[small]}, after={\blank[small]}]. It appears
>> to be reducing the space before the entire block of local footnotes
>> but not between the footnotes themselves, which is what I am trying
>> to do.
>
> Did you try "inbetween" or "distance"? (I’d assume the latter is for
> the distance between number and text, but inbetween is usually
> vertically.)
>
> https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupnote
>
>> Am I correct in assuming that the \setupnote should influence my
>> \placelocalfootnotes? Or is there something else I should do in the
>> case of local footnotes as distinct from general footnotes (my
>> document contains ONLY local footnotes, however).
>
> I was wondering if \setupnote[localfootnote][…] makes sense, but I
> can’t find in the sources if local footnotes are setup differently
> from general one.
>
> Hraban
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
> to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : https://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4591 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 496 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-23 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-23 7:21 jbf via ntg-context
2023-04-23 10:34 ` Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
2023-04-23 21:36 ` jbf via ntg-context
2023-04-24 7:33 ` Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
2023-04-24 9:21 ` jbf via ntg-context
2023-04-24 12:00 ` Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
2023-04-23 21:38 ` jbf via ntg-context [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd69fd53-37f6-ab75-b877-0c2d7015ce1b@gmail.com \
--to=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
--cc=roma83537@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).