[Unix-jun72] Minor errors

[Unix-jun72] Minor errors

[Hellwig Geisse]

I just did a 'grep' of some suspicious
character combinations and found the following:

e00-04:/ initialize i-nodes r1.,...,47. and wr1te the root device,
binary, etc.,
e04-01:       bne     3f /Is1t zero now?
e08-05:       bis     $103,r3 / now rbn,for,un1t,1e
e04-03:1: / flle just opened
e05-04: cmp     r1, ii / r1 = i-number of current flle
e03-01:       jsr     r0,rswap / read new process 1nto core
e04-04:       cmp     r1,$12 / is char a l1ne feed
e06-02:         br ret / it 1n r1; 1f there 1s no problem with reader,
it
e06-02: inc     *u.fofp / increment file offset to point to 'next' char
1n
e08-03:       br      1f / branch if block already 1n a I/O buffer
e08-03:       bis     $2000,(r5) / set read mu (bu: 100 1n 1/0 buffer)
e08-06:       bit    $173000,(r5) / lock+keep+active+outstand1ng
e11-07: cmp     0b,$1nbuf+256. / have we exceeded innut buffer size
e06-04: inc     *u.fofp / increment f11e offset to point to next
available
e06-05:  mov    r2,i.size / yes, increase the f11e size to file offset +
e06-06:                    / be written to the f11e
e08-03:tstdeve: / check whether permanent error has occured on special
f11e
e03-02:                        / to end of stack gets written out) ~
e08-03:       mov     u.base,r2 / put users base in r2 ~
e11-01: cdpb    B(r5),$'- / was this sh calleZd by init or loginx~
e03-02:       cmp     r2,$core / is u.break less than Score

As you can see, the errors are almost exclusively in
the comments. Someone with write access to the svn
repository could perhaps take care of that.

Hellwig

[Unix-jun72] Minor errors

[Brad Parker]

Hellwig Geisse wrote:
>I just did a 'grep' of some suspicious
>character combinations and found the following:

many of those should be fixed now - I just did a large commit
with diffs from James's OCR version.

-brad

[Unix-jun72] Minor errors

[Brad Parker]

I checked in the missing pages;  Now the only errors are due to
fpsum and the missing "sys read".

The cold=1 build does seem to write the file system.  There's still a
problem however.  I notice that that after the initial file system is
all written, the code does an RF read with a large positive word count
(this is bad, since the WC should be negative).  I'll be it's the
exec.

I think the exec of "init" is causing this, and the same thing happens
when I run a cold=0 load after building the file system.  But who knows.

So, we're closer.  Many thanks to James for offering his OCR version.
I'll put it up on my web site later today and send out an email,
along with the diff files.

-brad