The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: norman@oclsc.org (Norman Wilson)
Subject: [TUHS] PDP-11 questions
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:40:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453675247.12547.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org> (raw)

Noel Chiappa:

  I'd lay good money that the vast majority of PDP-11's never ran Unix. And
  UNIX might have happened on some other machine - it's not crucially tied to
  the PDP-11 - in fact, the ease with which it could be used on other machines
  was a huge part of its eventual success.

=======

I have to disagree in part: the PDP-11 is a big part of
what made UNIX so widespread, especially in university
departments, in the latter part of the 1970s.

That wasn't due so much to the PDP-11's technical details
as to its pricing.  The PDP-11 was a big sales success
because it was such a powerful machine, with a price that
individual departments could afford.  Without a platform
like that, I don't think UNIX would have spread nearly the
way it did, even before it began to appear in a significant
way on other architectures.  Save for the VAX, which was
really a PDP-11 in a gorilla suit, that didn't really happen
until the early 1980s anyway, and I'm not convinced it
would have happened had UNIX not already spread so much
on the PDP-11.

It worked both ways, of course.  I too suspect that a
majority (though I'm not so sure about `vast') of PDP-11s
never ran UNIX.  But I also suspect that a vast majority
of those that did might not have been purchased without
UNIX as a magnet.  I don't think those who weren't
around in the latter 1970s and early 1980s can appreciate
the ways in which UNIX captured many programmers and
sysadmins (the two were not so distinct back then!) as
no other competing system could.  It felt enormously
more efficient and more pleasant to work on and with
UNIX than with any of the competition, whether from DEC
or elsewhere.  At the very least, none of the other
system vendors had anything to match UNIX; and by the
same token, had UNIX not been there, other hardware
vendors' systems would have had better sales.

Sometime around 1981, the university department I worked
at, which already had a VAX-11/780 and a PDP-11/45 running
UNIX, wanted to get another system.  Data General tried
very hard to convince us to buy their VAX-competitor.
I remember our visiting their local office to run some
FORTRAN benchmarks.  The code needed some tweaking to
work under their OS, which DG claimed was better than
UNIX.  Us UNIX people had trouble restraining our chuckles
as we watched the DG guys, who I truly believe were experts
in their own OS, taking 15 or 20 minutes to do things that
would have taken two or three with a few shell loops and
ed commands.

DG did not get the sale.  We bought a second-hand VAX.
Blame UNIX.

Norman Wilson
Toronto ON


             reply	other threads:[~2016-01-24 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-24 22:40 Norman Wilson [this message]
2016-01-25  1:55 ` David Ritchie
2016-01-25  1:59   ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-25  2:14   ` Clem cole
2016-01-25 11:29 ` Tony Finch
2016-01-25 13:25   ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-25 16:18   ` Pete Turnbull
2016-01-25 19:37     ` Clem Cole
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-26 20:07 Doug McIlroy
2016-01-26 20:44 ` Clem Cole
2016-01-26 19:36 Doug McIlroy
2016-01-26 19:59 ` Warren Toomey
     [not found] <mailman.29.1453684304.15972.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2016-01-25  3:07 ` Johnny Billquist
2016-01-25  3:09 ` Johnny Billquist
2016-01-25 12:54   ` John Cowan
2016-01-25 13:09     ` Johnny Billquist
2016-01-25 13:49     ` Johnny Billquist
2016-01-25 16:00       ` John Cowan
2016-01-25 16:17         ` Johnny Billquist
2016-01-25 16:43           ` John Cowan
2016-01-25  1:11 Noel Chiappa
2016-01-25  1:30 ` Clem cole
2016-01-24 22:40 Norman Wilson
2016-01-25  0:23 ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-24 18:56 Noel Chiappa
     [not found] <mailman.25.1453658502.15972.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2016-01-24 18:34 ` Johnny Billquist
2016-01-24 18:30 Noel Chiappa
2016-01-24 18:36 ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-24 21:10   ` John Cowan
2016-01-25  0:11 ` scj
2016-01-25  0:36   ` Clem cole
2016-01-24 18:01 Noel Chiappa
2016-01-24 17:37 Mark Longridge
2016-01-24 18:49 ` Clem Cole
2016-01-25  3:16   ` Dave Horsfall
2016-01-25  5:32     ` Warren Toomey
2016-01-25 12:27       ` Clem cole
2016-01-25 13:38         ` Lawrence Stewart
2016-01-25 14:15           ` Clem Cole
2016-01-26 19:52         ` Dave Horsfall
2016-01-26 20:41           ` Clem Cole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1453675247.12547.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org \
    --to=norman@oclsc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).