* [Unix-jun72] And so does basic
@ 2008-05-05 13:01 Warren Toomey
2008-05-05 15:37 ` Brantley Coile
2008-05-05 19:14 ` Peter Jeremy
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Warren Toomey @ 2008-05-05 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
# bas
i=25
print i
2.50000000e1
for i = 1 10 print i next
1.00000000e0
2.00000000e0
3.00000000e0
4.00000000e0
5.00000000e0
6.00000000e0
7.00000000e0
8.00000000e0
9.00000000e0
1.00000000e1
So, that's asm, C, fortran, basic, and shell: 5 languages.
I'm sure we could get ed and roff to perform as turing machines, but
I will leave that as an exercise for the reader :-)
Warren
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Unix-jun72] And so does basic
2008-05-05 13:01 [Unix-jun72] And so does basic Warren Toomey
@ 2008-05-05 15:37 ` Brantley Coile
2008-05-05 19:14 ` Peter Jeremy
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2008-05-05 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
Congratulations, folks! This is really neat stuff.
Brantley Coile
> # bas
> i=25
> print i
> 2.50000000e1
> for i = 1 10 print i next
> 1.00000000e0
> 2.00000000e0
> 3.00000000e0
> 4.00000000e0
> 5.00000000e0
> 6.00000000e0
> 7.00000000e0
> 8.00000000e0
> 9.00000000e0
> 1.00000000e1
>
> So, that's asm, C, fortran, basic, and shell: 5 languages.
>
> I'm sure we could get ed and roff to perform as turing machines, but
> I will leave that as an exercise for the reader :-)
>
> Warren
> _______________________________________________
> Unix-jun72 mailing list
> Unix-jun72 at minnie.tuhs.org
> https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/unix-jun72
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Unix-jun72] And so does basic
2008-05-05 13:01 [Unix-jun72] And so does basic Warren Toomey
2008-05-05 15:37 ` Brantley Coile
@ 2008-05-05 19:14 ` Peter Jeremy
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Jeremy @ 2008-05-05 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:01:09PM +1000, Warren Toomey wrote:
>So, that's asm, C, fortran, basic, and shell: 5 languages.
Very good.
>I'm sure we could get ed and roff to perform as turing machines, but
>I will leave that as an exercise for the reader :-)
http://www.kernelthread.com/hanoi/html/troff.html
Shortening the variable names will make it compatible with old
{n,t}roff but I'm not sure what else might be different in v1.
BTW: The mailing list currently has a 'From: <unix-jun72 at tuhs.org>' and
'Reply-To: <unix-jun72 at minnie.tuhs.org>' - shouldn't these be the same?
--
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20080506/86af54fb/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-05 19:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-05 13:01 [Unix-jun72] And so does basic Warren Toomey
2008-05-05 15:37 ` Brantley Coile
2008-05-05 19:14 ` Peter Jeremy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).