The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wkt@tuhs.org (Warren Toomey)
Subject: [TUHS] Early Unix function calls: expensive?
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:35:43 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160103233543.GA10102@minnie.tuhs.org> (raw)

I just re-found a quote about Unix processes that I'd "lost". It's by
Steve Johnson:

    Dennis Ritchie encouraged modularity by telling all and sundry that
    function calls were really, really cheap in C. Everybody started
    writing small functions and modularizing. Years later we found out
    that function calls were still expensive on the PDP-11, and VAX code
    was often spending 50% of its time in the CALLS instruction. Dennis
    had lied to us! But it was too late; we were all hooked...
    http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/html/modularitychapter.html

Steve, can you recollect when you said this, was it just a quote for
Eric's book or did it come from elsewhere?

Does anybodu have a measure of the expense of function calls under Unix
on either platform?

Cheers, Warren


             reply	other threads:[~2016-01-03 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-03 23:35 Warren Toomey [this message]
2016-01-03 23:53 ` Tim Bradshaw
2016-01-04  0:01   ` John Cowan
2016-01-04  4:40     ` Armando Stettner
2016-01-04  8:52       ` Tim Bradshaw
2016-01-04 17:29         ` Larry McVoy
2016-01-04 13:50       ` Clem Cole
2016-01-05  2:00       ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-05 15:13         ` Clem Cole
2016-01-05 16:46           ` John Cowan
2016-01-05 17:33             ` Diomidis Spinellis
2016-01-05 17:42             ` Clem Cole
2016-01-05 17:28           ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-05 17:43             ` Clem Cole
2016-01-05 17:46               ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-05 18:03                 ` Warner Losh
2016-01-05 18:24                   ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-05 20:26                     ` scj
2016-01-05 20:49                     ` John Cowan
2016-01-05 23:24         ` Dave Horsfall
2016-01-05 23:55           ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-04  0:00 ` John Cowan
2016-01-04  0:42 ` scj
2016-01-04 11:35   ` Tony Finch
     [not found] <mailman.3.1451865187.15972.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2016-01-04  1:08 ` Johnny Billquist
2016-01-04  1:29   ` Larry McVoy
2016-01-04  1:31 Noel Chiappa
2016-01-04  2:24 ` scj
2016-01-04  4:24   ` Larry McVoy
2016-01-04  1:59 Norman Wilson
2016-01-04 15:09 ` John Cowan
2016-01-04  2:21 Clem Cole
2016-01-04 12:53 Noel Chiappa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160103233543.GA10102@minnie.tuhs.org \
    --to=wkt@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).