From: ron@ronnatalie.com (Ronald Natalie)
Subject: [TUHS] Early Unix function calls: expensive?
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:55:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62BE3BE6-EFF9-45F0-9419-EE611A98C2BA@ronnatalie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1601061023020.36058@aneurin.horsfall.org>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1012 bytes --]
The only thing we really used on RSTS was Basic Plus so I wouldn’t know, but I spent a lot of time making cross calls between MACRO-11 and FORTRAN on the RSX-11M and there was no MARK-based linkage in anything I saw. I had the kind of odd misfortunate to spend one summer in college writing a database system in Fortran and Macro-11 on RT and when I graduated the company saw that and set me down to work on FORTRAN/MACRO-based database on their two processor RSX-11M system.
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 6:24 PM, Dave Horsfall <dave at horsfall.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Ronald Natalie wrote:
>
>> Just never figured out how to make good use of the MARK instruction on
>> the PDP-11.
>
> RSX-11 probably used it, though, as could've RSTS...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2284 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20160105/af46c347/attachment.bin>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-03 23:35 Warren Toomey
2016-01-03 23:53 ` Tim Bradshaw
2016-01-04 0:01 ` John Cowan
2016-01-04 4:40 ` Armando Stettner
2016-01-04 8:52 ` Tim Bradshaw
2016-01-04 17:29 ` Larry McVoy
2016-01-04 13:50 ` Clem Cole
2016-01-05 2:00 ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-05 15:13 ` Clem Cole
2016-01-05 16:46 ` John Cowan
2016-01-05 17:33 ` Diomidis Spinellis
2016-01-05 17:42 ` Clem Cole
2016-01-05 17:28 ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-05 17:43 ` Clem Cole
2016-01-05 17:46 ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-05 18:03 ` Warner Losh
2016-01-05 18:24 ` Ronald Natalie
2016-01-05 20:26 ` scj
2016-01-05 20:49 ` John Cowan
2016-01-05 23:24 ` Dave Horsfall
2016-01-05 23:55 ` Ronald Natalie [this message]
2016-01-04 0:00 ` John Cowan
2016-01-04 0:42 ` scj
2016-01-04 11:35 ` Tony Finch
[not found] <mailman.3.1451865187.15972.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2016-01-04 1:08 ` Johnny Billquist
2016-01-04 1:29 ` Larry McVoy
2016-01-04 1:31 Noel Chiappa
2016-01-04 2:24 ` scj
2016-01-04 4:24 ` Larry McVoy
2016-01-04 1:59 Norman Wilson
2016-01-04 15:09 ` John Cowan
2016-01-04 2:21 Clem Cole
2016-01-04 12:53 Noel Chiappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62BE3BE6-EFF9-45F0-9419-EE611A98C2BA@ronnatalie.com \
--to=ron@ronnatalie.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).