The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / Atom feed
* Re: [TUHS] [patch] do not strip mdoc macros
@ 2019-03-15 21:21 Doug McIlroy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ messages in thread
From: Doug McIlroy @ 2019-03-15 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tuhs

>> But sed, awk, perl, python, ... lex and parse once into an AST or
>> bytecode, removing the recurring cost of comments, etc. that impact
>> groff.  So I don't think it's an even comparison.
> Of course it's a valid comparison.  Which sed or awk or shell script is
> distributed in a stripped/compressed form?  Do they store their AST
> somewhere, so as to avoid recompilation?  They do not.  Just as
> with groff, every parse starts anew.

Comments inside of a macro definition get scanned each time it's called.
This justifies the first paragraph above.

In the wild, almost all comments occur outside macro definitions.
This justifies the second.

Thus comments are harmless in practice.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 1+ messages in thread

only message in thread, back to index

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-15 21:21 [TUHS] [patch] do not strip mdoc macros Doug McIlroy

The Unix Heritage Society mailing list

Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox