The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeechang Lee <>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] ratfor vibe
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 16:54:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Erik E. Fair says:
> With regard to programming languages at UCB in 1980 ...
> I'd done something of a survey of colleges, and in my mind at the
> time, there were two approaches to a CS degree: mostly or entirely
> theoretical (those CS departments that had grown out of Mathematics
> tended to have this focus), or more practical
> tools/techniques/operational theory (those CS departments that had
> grown out of Engineering tended to be this way).

Quoting my 2019 message to the cctech mailing list:


Adam Thornton <> says:
> The genealogy of Computer Science departments (and their curricula)
> (at least in the US) is also weird and historically-contingent.
> Basically it seems to have been a tossup at any given school whether
> it came out of the Electr[ical|onic] Engineering department, in
> which case it was memories and logic gates and a bottom-up,
> hardware-focused curriculum, or out of the Mathematics department,
> in which case it was algorithms and complexity analysis and a
> software-focused curriculum.

Yes, I've noticed the same thing. Example: Harvard's CS department is
originally from the math side, while MIT's is from EE (thus today's

Berkeley = EE
Brown = Math
BYU = Math
Caltech = EE
Columbia = EE
Cornell = Operations research, math
Dartmouth = Math
Illinois = Math
NYU = Both (because Polytechnic developed its own CS program long
before NYU acquired it to regain an engineering school)
Penn = EE
UCLA = OR (probably because of the RAND heritage)

Caltech until very recently did not formally offer CS degrees;
students received degrees in Engineering and Applied Science, with a
focus on CS (or aeronautics, or civil, or ME).

Illinois is an example of a track we might call "other" or even
"defense". With government funding the university built its own
computers (including ILLIAC and PLATO), and the group that did so
became the CS department, but the undergraduate CS program began
within the math department. Harvard's and Penn's programs might also

Undergraduate CS degrees are BA (Example: Harvard), BS (Example:
Penn), or both (Example: Columbia). At Penn one must be an engineering
student to major in CS. At Columbia one can major in CS in either the
liberal arts or engineering schools, but with different
curriculums. At Yale there is one undergraduate school, within which
one can receive a BA or BS in CS, with different curriculums. Cornell,
Northwestern, and Berkeley offer CS in their separate liberal arts and
engineering schools; undergraduates receive BA or BS degrees with
identical CS curriculums, with only other requirements differing.

I've read that medical schools are good at teaching either
pharmacology (drugs), or pathology (diseases); perhaps this is also
because of the expertise/specialty of their early faculty members.


> Two paths to a computer science degree: A.B. CS from L&S, or
> B.S. EECS from the College of Engineering (which you had to be
> explicitly admitted to before you got there).

Still true today. As I mention above, Berkeley's CS curriculum is identical regardless of the degree (or was the last time I checked), something not always true at other universities that offer multiple CS undergraduate degree options.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-02  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-01 18:19 Noel Chiappa
2022-02-01 18:47 ` Clem Cole
2022-02-01 19:10   ` Dan Cross
2022-02-01 19:39     ` Clem Cole
2022-02-01 21:21       ` Dan Cross
2022-02-01 21:33         ` Clem Cole
2022-02-01 23:12           ` John Cowan
2022-02-01 19:39   ` Richard Salz
2022-02-01 22:30   ` Erik E. Fair
2022-02-02  0:54     ` Yeechang Lee [this message]
2022-02-01 21:50 ` Win Treese
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-31 20:46 Will Senn
2022-02-01 15:37 ` arnold
2022-02-01 15:52   ` Ralph Corderoy
2022-02-01 16:58     ` Clem Cole
2022-02-01 17:02     ` silas poulson
2022-02-02  7:47     ` arnold
2022-02-03 18:57       ` silas poulson
2022-02-04  8:26         ` arnold
2022-02-04 19:41           ` John Cowan
2022-02-10 15:18       ` Ralph Corderoy
2022-02-03  4:00 ` Will Senn
2022-02-03  4:31   ` Al Kossow
2022-02-03  5:16     ` Warner Losh
2022-02-03 20:00   ` Adam Thornton
2022-02-04  6:06     ` Ori Idan
2022-02-04 17:35       ` Adam Thornton
2022-02-04 17:44         ` Will Senn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).