The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pete@dunnington.plus.com (Pete Turnbull)
Subject: [TUHS] Can't load split I&D files (in one PDP-11/23 PLUS)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:26:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A43EB6E.1030807@dunnington.plus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090625204930.GC10610@freebie.xs4all.nl>

On 25/06/2009 21:49, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Quoting SPC, who wrote on Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:57:47PM +0200 ..
>> Well, the matter is simple: I'm trying to install 2.11 BSD in one PDP-11/23
>> PLUS with 4MB of ram, and the 'restor' and 'icheck' utilities don't load in
>> he PDP, returning this message:
>>
>>   "Can't load split I&D files"
>>
>> I tried with the diverse distributions of Vtserver and diverse versions of
>> 'restor'. In the case of the 2.9BSD this don't happen but the utility can't
>> understand what is the 'vt' device.
>>
>> Someone has encountered and solved this problem ?
> 
> I could be wrong, but I think the 11/23 is not a split ID CPU?

Correct, it isn't.  You cannot run 2.11BSD in a PDP-11/23 or similar 
machine because a lot of things in 2.11BSD require split I&D.  It's 
declared on the first page of the setup instructions:

    "This distribution can be booted on a PDP-11 with 1Mb of memory or
     more, separate I&D, and with any of the following disks:"

You need an 11/73 or better to have split I&D.  For those who might not 
know what that means, it refers to the processor's ability to keep 
I(nstructions) and D(ata) in separate spaces, so in effect virtually 
doubling the amount of memory that can be used.  That is, you can have 
(almost) 64K of instructions *and* (almost) 64K of data at the same 
time.  Without split I&D, you have 64K in total for both.

-- 
Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Network Manager
						University of York



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-25 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-25 18:57 SPC
2009-06-25 20:49 ` Wilko Bulte
2009-06-25 21:12   ` Lyle Bickley
2009-06-25 21:19   ` Bill Pechter
2009-06-25 21:31     ` Wilko Bulte
2009-06-25 21:26   ` Pete Turnbull [this message]
2009-06-25 22:17     ` Lyle Bickley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A43EB6E.1030807@dunnington.plus.com \
    --to=pete@dunnington.plus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).