The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kjörling" <michael@kjorling.se>
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: Re: [TUHS] First book on Unix for general readership
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 16:12:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <854f7b58-9ba0-476f-a7e6-8579f4a8048d@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1jKkMQ-2hN-00@marmaro.de>

On 4 Apr 2020 17:05 +0200, from meillo@marmaro.de (markus schnalke):
> found on Wikipedia:
> 
> 	As well as the Bourne shell, he wrote the adb debugger
> 	and The UNIX System, the second book on the UNIX system,
> 	intended for a general readership.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_R._Bourne
> 
> Thus I now wonder what the first book on Unix, intended for a
> general readership was.

I would be careful with that claim.

First, it appears to lack a citation. (Someone here might be able to help
with that.)

Second, once you unpack it, the claim itself can be parsed in two ways,
yielding quite different meanings.

One way of parsing the claim is that Bourne wrote the book _The UNIX
System_ which was the second book on the UNIX system. It was also a book
which was intended for a general readership, presumably thereby setting it
apart from the first book which was not intended for a general readership.

The other way of parsing the claim is that he wrote the book _The UNIX
System_ which was second in the set of intended-for-a-general-readership
books on the UNIX system (as opposed to the set of books on the UNIX
system which were intended for other than a general readership, or for
_any_ readership, of which there may have been any number prior to this
book), thereby setting it apart only from the first book on the UNIX
system intended for a general readership.

I'm not a good enough UNIX historian to know which meaning is correct.

-- 
Michael Kjörling • https://michael.kjorling.se • michael@kjorling.se
 “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-04 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-04 15:05 markus schnalke
2020-04-04 15:48 ` Nemo Nusquam
2020-04-14 15:27   ` Steve Mynott
2020-04-14 20:32     ` Warner Losh
2020-04-14 22:03       ` Warner Losh
2020-04-04 16:12 ` Michael Kjörling [this message]
2020-04-04 16:45   ` markus schnalke
2020-04-05 23:57     ` Ronald Natalie
2020-04-06  0:08       ` Larry McVoy
2020-04-06  0:27         ` Clem Cole
2020-04-06  0:46           ` Michael Usher via TUHS
2020-04-06  1:41             ` Clem Cole
2020-04-06  1:46               ` Michael Usher via TUHS
2020-04-06 14:51             ` ron
2020-04-08 22:23               ` Greg A. Woods
2020-04-06  0:17       ` Dave Horsfall
2020-04-06 14:54         ` ron
2020-04-06 14:54         ` ron
2020-04-07 10:42       ` Derek Fawcus
2020-04-08 22:16         ` Greg A. Woods
2020-04-04 17:32 ` Warner Losh
2020-04-04 22:41 Doug McIlroy
2020-04-14  2:13 Doug McIlroy
2020-04-14  5:30 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2020-04-14  5:38   ` Warner Losh
2020-04-14 15:10 Doug McIlroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=854f7b58-9ba0-476f-a7e6-8579f4a8048d@localhost \
    --to=michael@kjorling.se \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).