The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: charles.unix.pro@gmail.com (Charles Anthony)
Subject: [TUHS] [TUHS} PDP-11, Unix, octal?
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:58:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANV78LTKjYVLWa4_-TKSa5oxHrzf48jmmOKbhj5zh_TS_Sz+jg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118184709.GC82883@server.rulingia.com>

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Peter Jeremy <peter at rulingia.com> wrote:

> On 2017-Jan-18 07:04:31 +0100, Lars Brinkhoff <lars at nocrew.org> wrote:
> >The PDP-10 did not have a fixed byte size.  Were there any 9-bit
> >machines?
>
> The Honeywell 6000 series (aka 66/DPS, a rebadged GE 6xx series) was
> 36-bit and supported either 6-bit or 9-bit characters.  I don't recall
> how you selected which you were using but I recall both Pascal and APL
> used the 9-bit byte.
>
>
The [EIS] instruction set supported 4, 6 and 9 bit operands; it was a
matter of which instructions you used.

For pl1, the instructions generated were driven by the DCLs; for Pascal and
APL, [I would guess] that the compiler/interpreter writers defined
character size to be 9 bits and generated the 9 bit variants of the
instructions.

Move 9 6-bit bytes starting at the 3rd byte in the word, convert to 4 bit
bytes in some signed manner, and store as 10 4-bit bytes starting at offset
6.


MLR ,,400        move with sign captured
ADSC6 FLD1,3,9   sending descriptor
ADSC4 FLD2,6,10  receiving descriptor


-- Charles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170118/4b116f73/attachment.html>


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-18 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18  2:33 Noel Chiappa
2017-01-18  3:06 ` Steve Johnson
2017-01-18  3:36   ` Dan Cross
2017-01-18  6:53     ` Angelo Papenhoff
2017-01-18  7:31       ` ron minnich
2017-01-18  8:09         ` Angelo Papenhoff
2017-01-18 21:04     ` Steve Johnson
2017-01-18 21:42       ` Charles Anthony
2017-01-18  6:04   ` Lars Brinkhoff
2017-01-18 18:47     ` Peter Jeremy
2017-01-18 18:58       ` Charles Anthony [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-18 14:28 Nelson H. F. Beebe
2017-01-17  2:23 Doug McIlroy
2017-01-18 16:47 ` Clem Cole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANV78LTKjYVLWa4_-TKSa5oxHrzf48jmmOKbhj5zh_TS_Sz+jg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=charles.unix.pro@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).