The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rochkind@basepath.com (Marc Rochkind)
Subject: [TUHS] Questions for TUHS great minds
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:54:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOkr1zVQf+H8AJ=roKXyzfUQ-2y5xesYU_fdCyVmJSfPhDptGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170111170112.6D81840FC@lod.com>

A couple of answers:

"Or does the idea of a single OS disintegrate into a fractal cloud of
zero-cost VM's?"

I would say zero-cost computing. Whether that occurs at VMs or even on what
we would recognize as a computer seems too limiting. I think all that
matters is that the program be elaborated. (There, I used a term from the
Algol 68 report!)

"Would we still recognize it as a Unix?"

Not sure what "it" refers to, but I'm sure that any and all things
UNIX-like would be programs that could be run.

I imagine that clever marketeers will design a box that can appear to run
programs (they may or may not actually run on anything contained in the
box) and then call it a "computer", for those who still care. It could have
flashing lights, even. And, as it is nearly empty, it could range in size
from a watch (or smaller) to a big desktop box.

In today's terminology, what I see is that programs will run in the cloud.
Programs I think are of eternal importance. How they are executed will
become irrelevant.

Somewhere in that cloud are actual computers, of course. How they work I'm
sure will change drastically, as it has fairly often, from the beginning.

--Marc

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Corey Lindsly <corey at lod.com> wrote:

> >
> > On 2017-01-11 17:25, Ron Natalie wrote:
> > > Somewhere I have an etherkiller (unfortunately it is non functional).
> >
> > FTFY
> >
>
> I don't think so. RJ-11? More like a telephone killer, or home
> firestarter.
>
> --corey
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170111/a6e8f068/attachment-0001.html>


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-11 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-11  2:33 Robert Swierczek
2017-01-11 16:25 ` Ron Natalie
2017-01-11 16:50   ` Jacob Goense
2017-01-11 17:01     ` Corey Lindsly
2017-01-11 17:54       ` Marc Rochkind [this message]
2017-01-11 20:32       ` Jacob Goense
2017-01-11 18:34 ` Steve Johnson
2017-01-11 19:46   ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2017-01-17 13:09   ` Tim Bradshaw
2017-01-17 13:36     ` Michael Kjörling
2017-01-17 19:55     ` Steve Johnson
2017-02-01 23:32       ` Erik E. Fair
2017-01-17 14:27 Nelson H. F. Beebe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOkr1zVQf+H8AJ=roKXyzfUQ-2y5xesYU_fdCyVmJSfPhDptGQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rochkind@basepath.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).