* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
@ 2003-06-22 12:08 Natalia Portillo
2003-06-22 16:21 ` Andru Luvisi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Natalia Portillo @ 2003-06-22 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
Is it possible to get a UNIX that runs on a 8086 or 8088 PC?
Or for 80286 or 80386?
Xenix?
AT&T?
SCO?
Interactive UNIX?
Where please?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
2003-06-22 12:08 [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086 Natalia Portillo
@ 2003-06-22 16:21 ` Andru Luvisi
2003-06-22 16:33 ` Andru Luvisi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andru Luvisi @ 2003-06-22 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> Is it possible to get a UNIX that runs on a 8086 or 8088 PC?
> Or for 80286 or 80386?
>
> Xenix?
> AT&T?
> SCO?
> Interactive UNIX?
Minix is available and under a BSD like license. I don't know if it will
suit you since it isn't derived from AT&T code, and the source for the for
the compiler is not included.
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/minix.html
Andru
--
Andru Luvisi, Programmer/Analyst
Quote Of The Moment:
Churchill's Commentary on Man:
Man will occasionally stumble over the truth,
but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
2003-06-22 16:21 ` Andru Luvisi
@ 2003-06-22 16:33 ` Andru Luvisi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andru Luvisi @ 2003-06-22 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Andru Luvisi wrote:
[snip]
> Minix is available and under a BSD like license. I don't know if it will
> suit you since it isn't derived from AT&T code, and the source for the for
> the compiler is not included.
>
> http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/minix.html
I spoke too soon. Apparently the sources for ACK are now available:
ftp://ftp.cs.vu.nl/pub/kjb/ACK/ACK-5.2.tar.gz
Andru
--
Andru Luvisi, Programmer/Analyst
Quote Of The Moment:
Heisenberg may have been here.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
2003-06-23 7:15 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-23 7:31 ` Warren Toomey
@ 2003-06-24 20:13 ` Natalia Portillo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Natalia Portillo @ 2003-06-24 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
Finally the posts became absolutely out of context.
I was talking about getting UNIX variants, nor "derivates" (such as
Linux or MINIX), nor current in-development projects like
Free/Open/Net-BSD.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
2003-06-23 7:31 ` Warren Toomey
@ 2003-06-23 21:23 ` Kenneth Stailey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Stailey @ 2003-06-23 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
My turn to be the apologetic pendant but Andy wrote that he was trying to clone
version 7 not version 6. A quick way to check is look for a stat.h file with a
"struct stat" in it. That was added after version 6.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
2003-06-23 7:15 zmkm zmkm
@ 2003-06-23 7:31 ` Warren Toomey
2003-06-23 21:23 ` Kenneth Stailey
2003-06-24 20:13 ` Natalia Portillo
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Warren Toomey @ 2003-06-23 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:15:39AM +0000, zmkm zmkm wrote:
> warren
>
> you missunderstood my point , I didn't imply it has at&t code!
Ah, apologies. I usually take ``derived'' to mean ``used code from'' :-)
Ciao!
Warren
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
@ 2003-06-23 7:15 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-23 7:31 ` Warren Toomey
2003-06-24 20:13 ` Natalia Portillo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: zmkm zmkm @ 2003-06-23 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
warren
you missunderstood my point , I didn't imply it has at&t code !, what I
meant is it has the look and feel of at&t unix and indeed it was modeled (if
you prefer instead of derived :-) ) after unix 6 as per the author and the
way it look and feel.
as for the book , yup I read both the original book and the second one ,
that's what I meant it's an educational project oriented towards students.
cheers
zmkm
>From: Warren Toomey <wkt at tuhs.org>
>To: The Unix Heritage Society <tuhs at tuhs.org>
>Subject: Re: [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
>Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:28:41 +1000
>
>On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 05:29:11PM +0000, zmkm zmkm wrote:
> > actually [Minix is] indeed derived from at&t unix 6 also it feels closer
>to
> > the actual old unix than other newer variants and it comes with C
>compiler and
> > an assembler in the distribution
>
>Sorry to be a pedant here, but Minix was written wholly from scratch and
>has no AT&T code in it at all. I know, I've been playing with it since
>version 1.1. See also Tanenbaum's Operating Systems: Design and
>Implementation
>textbook for the fully story.
>
>Ciao!
> Warren
>_______________________________________________
>TUHS mailing list
>TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
>http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
@ 2003-06-23 7:15 zmkm zmkm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: zmkm zmkm @ 2003-06-23 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
warren
you missunderstood my point , I didn't imply it has at&t code !, what I
meant is it has the look and feel of at&t unix and indeed it was modeled (if
you prefer instead of derived :-) ) after unix 6 as per the author and the
way it look and feel.
as for the book , yup I read both the original book and the second one ,
that's what I meant it's an educational project oriented towards students.
cheers
zmkm
>From: Warren Toomey <wkt at tuhs.org>
>To: The Unix Heritage Society <tuhs at tuhs.org>
>Subject: Re: [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
>Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:28:41 +1000
>
>On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 05:29:11PM +0000, zmkm zmkm wrote:
> > actually [Minix is] indeed derived from at&t unix 6 also it feels closer
>to
> > the actual old unix than other newer variants and it comes with C
>compiler and
> > an assembler in the distribution
>
>Sorry to be a pedant here, but Minix was written wholly from scratch and
>has no AT&T code in it at all. I know, I've been playing with it since
>version 1.1. See also Tanenbaum's Operating Systems: Design and
>Implementation
>textbook for the fully story.
>
>Ciao!
> Warren
>_______________________________________________
>TUHS mailing list
>TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
>http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
2003-06-22 17:29 zmkm zmkm
@ 2003-06-22 21:28 ` Warren Toomey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Warren Toomey @ 2003-06-22 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 05:29:11PM +0000, zmkm zmkm wrote:
> actually [Minix is] indeed derived from at&t unix 6 also it feels closer to
> the actual old unix than other newer variants and it comes with C compiler and
> an assembler in the distribution
Sorry to be a pedant here, but Minix was written wholly from scratch and
has no AT&T code in it at all. I know, I've been playing with it since
version 1.1. See also Tanenbaum's Operating Systems: Design and Implementation
textbook for the fully story.
Ciao!
Warren
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
@ 2003-06-22 17:47 zmkm zmkm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: zmkm zmkm @ 2003-06-22 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
natalia
check also comp.os.minix it's active.
zmkm
>From: "Natalia Portillo" <iosglpgc at teleline.es>
>To: <tuhs at minnie.tuhs.org>
>Subject: [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
>Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 13:08:28 +0100
>
>Is it possible to get a UNIX that runs on a 8086 or 8088 PC?
>Or for 80286 or 80386?
>
>Xenix?
>AT&T?
>SCO?
>Interactive UNIX?
>
>Where please?
>
>_______________________________________________
>TUHS mailing list
>TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
>http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
@ 2003-06-22 17:29 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-22 21:28 ` Warren Toomey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: zmkm zmkm @ 2003-06-22 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
andru
actually it's indeed derived from at&t unix 6 also it feels closer to the
actual old unix than other newer variants and it comes with C compiler and
an assembler in the distribution ,
I am currently using 2.0.3 and I like it except for few reservations about
its developments tools , it's nice in the way unix purist used to like
versions 6 and 7 , small efficient neat and trying hard to become fully
posix .
the development tools aren't as good as they should be I don't like the ACK
(amersterdam compiler kit) it feels gaged but its latest c compiler is
highly ansi compatible , its assembler is a close cousin to the old
assembler in IBM PC/IX version of unix.
to answer natalia
you can run it in two modes 16 bit and 32 bit check the 2.0.3 distribution
page there are several packages 86/286/386 , don't bother with the so called
2.0.0. or CD distribution it's old., the real nice touch is the version that
runs in dos under windows , it's cute but be aware not everything works in
due to the limited resources , but I like it for quick hacks.
minix was done for educational purposes the book published by AST the guy
behind minix contains complete source code and oriented towards students .
here's the direct link to 2.0.3.
http://www.cs.vu.nl/pub/minix/2.0.3/
good luck
>From: Andru Luvisi <luvisi at andru.sonoma.edu>
>Reply-To: Andru Luvisi <luvisi at andru.sonoma.edu>
>To: Natalia Portillo <iosglpgc at teleline.es>
>CC: tuhs at minnie.tuhs.org
>Subject: Re: [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086
>Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 09:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
>
>On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Andru Luvisi wrote:
>[snip]
> > Minix is available and under a BSD like license. I don't know if it
>will
> > suit you since it isn't derived from AT&T code, and the source for the
>for
> > the compiler is not included.
> >
> > http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/minix.html
>
>I spoke too soon. Apparently the sources for ACK are now available:
> ftp://ftp.cs.vu.nl/pub/kjb/ACK/ACK-5.2.tar.gz
>
>Andru
>--
>Andru Luvisi, Programmer/Analyst
>
>Quote Of The Moment:
> Heisenberg may have been here.
>
>_______________________________________________
>TUHS mailing list
>TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
>http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-24 20:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-22 12:08 [TUHS] Getting UNIXs for 16-bit 8086 Natalia Portillo
2003-06-22 16:21 ` Andru Luvisi
2003-06-22 16:33 ` Andru Luvisi
2003-06-22 17:29 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-22 21:28 ` Warren Toomey
2003-06-22 17:47 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-23 7:15 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-23 7:15 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-23 7:31 ` Warren Toomey
2003-06-23 21:23 ` Kenneth Stailey
2003-06-24 20:13 ` Natalia Portillo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).