* [TUHS] re: The ^ = | ?
@ 2003-01-24 7:22 Dennis Ritchie
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dennis Ritchie @ 2003-01-24 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
As Norman said, the earliest notation for
pipes used an extension (or abuse) of the semantics
of > and < .
Warren's memory of what Salus wrote (it's on p. 52-53)
is correct about the introduction of | (though I suspect
that McIlroy (whom Salus quotes) is being kind to me
when he said "he [Ken] couldn't bear to reveal my [Doug's]
ugly syntax." Actually, I was responsible for the
particular < and > syntax as implemented, although the
whole idea came from much earlier on blackboard-only
ideas, and the blackboard was Doug's.
As to the original question: probably the ^ as an alternative
to | (which does seem to be there from the start, i.e. 4th
Edition) did have to do with character-set convenience
on upper-case-only terminals. The TTY driver accepted
\! as an escape for |, but this was somewhat of a pain.
Dennis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-01-24 7:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-24 7:22 [TUHS] re: The ^ = | ? Dennis Ritchie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).