The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [TUHS] Anyone else here remember Portapunch?
@ 2015-06-21 16:06 Dave Horsfall
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Horsfall @ 2015-06-21 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Subject: Re: [GreenKeys] Replacing Chad, was: Black tape

On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Jones, Douglas W wrote:

> The flaws in the Votomatic were a bit subtle, but in retrospect, if you 
> read the patents for the IBM Portapunch (the direct predecessor of the 
> Votomatic) and for the Votomatic, you find that the flaw that was its 
> eventual downfall -- at least in the public's mind -- is fully 
> documented in the patents.  Of course IBM's (and later CESI's, after IBM 
> walked away from the Votomatic in the late 1960s) salesmen never 
> mentioned those flaws.

Portapunch?  Arrgghh!

We had to put up with that Satan-spawn in our University days...  Only 40 
columns wide, it had specific encodings for FORTRAN words, and it was just 
as well that FORTRAN ignored white space (I know this for a fact, when I 
fed a deck into a "real" card reader one time).

Being but mere impecunious Uni students and having to actually buy the 
things, we resorted to fixing mis-punches by literally sticky-taping the 
chads back.

For some reason, the computer operators (IBM 360/50) hated us...

I really do hope that the inventor of Portapunch is still having holes 
punched through him with a paper-clip.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-06-21 16:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-21 16:06 [TUHS] Anyone else here remember Portapunch? Dave Horsfall

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).