* [ISSUE] JRNL: Source wrong?
@ 2020-02-23 16:31 Anachron
2020-02-23 23:58 ` jrnl: " travankor
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anachron @ 2020-02-23 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 291 bytes --]
New issue by Anachron on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/19438
Description:
Is there a reason why https://github.com/maebert/jrnl is being used for the `jrnl` source?
The original source is here: https://github.com/jrnl-org/jrnl
@travankor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: jrnl: Source wrong?
2020-02-23 16:31 [ISSUE] JRNL: Source wrong? Anachron
@ 2020-02-23 23:58 ` travankor
2020-03-06 9:20 ` Anachron
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: travankor @ 2020-02-23 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 505 bytes --]
New comment by travankor on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/19438#issuecomment-590132127
Comment:
>Is there a reason why https://github.com/maebert/jrnl is being used for the jrnl source?
They created a new org for the project and the original author's repo became a fork.
I haven't had the time to maintain the package and would rather pass the maintainership of this package to someone else. @Anachron feel free to update the package and maintain it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: jrnl: Source wrong?
2020-02-23 16:31 [ISSUE] JRNL: Source wrong? Anachron
2020-02-23 23:58 ` jrnl: " travankor
@ 2020-03-06 9:20 ` Anachron
2020-03-14 11:33 ` Anachron
2020-03-14 11:33 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " Anachron
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anachron @ 2020-03-06 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 226 bytes --]
New comment by Anachron on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/19438#issuecomment-595677738
Comment:
I've written my own `jrnl` in `$SHELL`, someone else gotta step in and update it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: jrnl: Source wrong?
2020-02-23 16:31 [ISSUE] JRNL: Source wrong? Anachron
2020-02-23 23:58 ` jrnl: " travankor
2020-03-06 9:20 ` Anachron
@ 2020-03-14 11:33 ` Anachron
2020-03-14 11:33 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " Anachron
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anachron @ 2020-03-14 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 220 bytes --]
New comment by Anachron on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/19438#issuecomment-599044296
Comment:
Closing, not interested in this monster of python code for a simple journal.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] jrnl: Source wrong?
2020-02-23 16:31 [ISSUE] JRNL: Source wrong? Anachron
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-14 11:33 ` Anachron
@ 2020-03-14 11:33 ` Anachron
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anachron @ 2020-03-14 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 294 bytes --]
Closed issue by Anachron on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/19438
Description:
Is there a reason why https://github.com/maebert/jrnl is being used for the `jrnl` source?
The original source is here: https://github.com/jrnl-org/jrnl
@travankor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-14 11:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-23 16:31 [ISSUE] JRNL: Source wrong? Anachron
2020-02-23 23:58 ` jrnl: " travankor
2020-03-06 9:20 ` Anachron
2020-03-14 11:33 ` Anachron
2020-03-14 11:33 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " Anachron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).