* [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils
@ 2020-04-01 17:19 ailiop-git
2020-04-01 17:47 ` xtraeme
` (37 more replies)
0 siblings, 38 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: ailiop-git @ 2020-04-01 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 701 bytes --]
New issue by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556
Description:
Commit 9cd29dcf7e ("coreutils: disable statx() support on glibc.") disabled detection of statx support as a workaround, due to the kernel>=v4.11 requirement that breaks travis.
Restoring statx support in coreutils would be nice, as stat (1) and ls are able to report inode birth times only via statx.
@xtraeme not sure what the plan with travis is, but would it make sense to create a base-minimal-travis that depends on a coreutils-compat (or something, maybe a subpkg) that disables statx? That way we can re-enable it on coreutils so that base-system is not impacted.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
@ 2020-04-01 17:47 ` xtraeme
2020-04-01 18:02 ` ailiop-git
` (36 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-01 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607396388
Comment:
Seriously this is bullshit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
2020-04-01 17:47 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-01 18:02 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-01 18:07 ` xtraeme
` (35 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: ailiop-git @ 2020-04-01 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 278 bytes --]
New comment by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607404490
Comment:
so what is the issue with travis anyway? the config is pointing to bionic, which should run a recent enough kernel to support statx.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
2020-04-01 17:47 ` xtraeme
2020-04-01 18:02 ` ailiop-git
@ 2020-04-01 18:07 ` xtraeme
2020-04-01 18:53 ` ailiop-git
` (34 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-01 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 158 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607406940
Comment:
See xbps issues
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-01 18:07 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-01 18:53 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-01 19:06 ` xtraeme
` (33 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: ailiop-git @ 2020-04-01 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 333 bytes --]
New comment by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607430434
Comment:
I assume you meant https://travis-ci.org/github/void-linux/xbps/jobs/669154357.
Ok, so in that case can we just build xbps on travis with `dist: bionic` and get rid of the workarounds?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-01 18:53 ` ailiop-git
@ 2020-04-01 19:06 ` xtraeme
2020-04-01 21:18 ` ailiop-git
` (32 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-01 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607436586
Comment:
Try it yourself
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-01 19:06 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-01 21:18 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 9:40 ` xtraeme
` (31 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: ailiop-git @ 2020-04-01 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 207 bytes --]
New comment by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607494706
Comment:
https://travis-ci.org/github/ailiop-git/xbps/builds/669887920
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-01 21:18 ` ailiop-git
@ 2020-04-02 9:40 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 11:12 ` xtraeme
` (30 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 235 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607736669
Comment:
hmm cool, can you please submit a PR in xbps? and then we can reactivate statx in coreutils.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 9:40 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 11:12 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 11:21 ` Johnnynator
` (29 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 208 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607781184
Comment:
@ailiop-git merged, thanks. Do you want to make the coreutils PR?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 11:12 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 11:21 ` Johnnynator
2020-04-02 11:23 ` pullmoll
` (28 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: Johnnynator @ 2020-04-02 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 279 bytes --]
New comment by Johnnynator on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607785142
Comment:
Just as a note, we still have linux3.16 and linux4.9. And I think coreutils should work with them, as long as we still provide them.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 11:21 ` Johnnynator
@ 2020-04-02 11:23 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 11:26 ` ailiop-git
` (27 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 250 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607786300
Comment:
Perhaps create a coreutils-legacy package which disables the statx(2) check and is built at the same time?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 11:23 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 11:26 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 11:29 ` pullmoll
` (26 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: ailiop-git @ 2020-04-02 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 370 bytes --]
New comment by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607787475
Comment:
hmm do we have any testing on those older kernels? I'd suspect there may be further problems with glibc being built on newer kernels and autodetecting features that are not necessarily available on a 3.16 kernel for example.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 11:26 ` ailiop-git
@ 2020-04-02 11:29 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 11:32 ` xtraeme
` (25 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 266 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607788563
Comment:
I do not test the 3.16 kernel, just make sure it can be built. I don't actually know if we have any users of this version.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 11:29 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 11:32 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:12 ` pullmoll
` (24 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 184 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607790113
Comment:
Someone with glibc please test linux3.16.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 11:32 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:12 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:14 ` xtraeme
` (23 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 259 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607807966
Comment:
linux3.16 does not even boot on my (recent) hardware.
I'll try to catch any log but currently cannot test it here.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:12 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 12:14 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:17 ` ailiop-git
` (22 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 270 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607809278
Comment:
I'll test it, but I'm using musl and there shouldn't be any difference. glibc might have issues as @ailiop-git mentioned above.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:14 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:17 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 12:19 ` xtraeme
` (21 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: ailiop-git @ 2020-04-02 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 567 bytes --]
New comment by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607810623
Comment:
3.16 doesn't seem to be booting at all (getting stuck in early boot process after decompress/parsing ELF, and/or cold-rebooting). I can try to debug it later on a VM if there's still interest in having this kernel around, let me know.
3.18, 4.9 boot fine, and coreutils doesn't complain with statx enabled (glibc silently fallsback to stat).
BTW 3.18 isn't LTS upstream (@pullmoll should we consider dropping it?)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:17 ` ailiop-git
@ 2020-04-02 12:19 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:20 ` xtraeme
` (20 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 203 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607811362
Comment:
rofl my system reboots instantly after loading the initramfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:19 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:20 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:20 ` pullmoll
` (19 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 197 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607811615
Comment:
looks like 3.16 is completely broken, let's remove it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:20 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:20 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:21 ` pullmoll
` (18 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 282 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607811839
Comment:
Same here. I can not get a single log output :-P *agree to remove*
I wonder who requested it and never reported back that it didn't work.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:20 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 12:21 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:22 ` xtraeme
` (17 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607811839
Comment:
Same here. I can not get a single log output :-P *agree to remove*
I wonder who requested it and never reported back that it didn't work.
I could boot it several versions back in the past, though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:21 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 12:22 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:23 ` pullmoll
` (16 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 224 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607812709
Comment:
@pullmoll as @ailiop-git mentions above the -legacy subpkg isn't required at all.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:22 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:23 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:23 ` xtraeme
` (15 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 306 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607813281
Comment:
@ailiop-git 3.18? We don't have that or do we?
3.16 worked when I added it and perhaps a couple of version more.
@xtraeme ok, then let's merge @ailiop-git PR.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:23 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 12:23 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:24 ` xtraeme
` (14 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607813323
Comment:
@ailiop-git linux3.18 was removed long ago from void-packages but looks like the binpkgs are still there. The void official repos are full of obsolete/removed pkgs...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:23 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:24 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:26 ` xtraeme
` (13 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 233 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607813647
Comment:
I mentioned this issue lots of times to the admins in charge but nobody made any action...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:24 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:26 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:28 ` ailiop-git
` (12 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2494 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607814350
Comment:
this is on musl:
```
[-] linux3.16-3.16.82_1 Linux kernel and modules (3.16 series)
[-] linux3.16-headers-3.16.82_1 Linux kernel and modules (3.16 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux3.18-3.18.124_1 The Linux kernel and modules (3.18 series)
[-] linux3.18-headers-3.18.124_1 The Linux kernel and modules (3.18 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux4.14-4.14.172_1 Linux kernel and modules (4.14 series)
[-] linux4.14-headers-4.14.172_1 Linux kernel and modules (4.14 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux4.19-4.19.113_1 Linux kernel and modules (4.19 series)
[-] linux4.19-headers-4.19.113_1 Linux kernel and modules (4.19 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux4.4-4.4.215_1 The Linux kernel and modules (4.4 series)
[-] linux4.4-headers-4.4.215_1 The Linux kernel and modules (4.4 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux4.9-4.9.215_1 Linux kernel and modules (4.9 series)
[-] linux4.9-headers-4.9.215_1 Linux kernel and modules (4.9 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux5.2-5.2.21_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.2 series)
[-] linux5.2-headers-5.2.21_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.2 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux5.3-5.3.18_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.3 series)
[-] linux5.3-headers-5.3.18_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.3 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux5.4-5.4.29_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.4 series)
[-] linux5.4-headers-5.4.29_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.4 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[-] linux5.5-5.5.14_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.5 series)
[-] linux5.5-headers-5.5.14_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.5 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
[*] linux5.6-5.6.2_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.6 series)
[-] linux5.6-headers-5.6.2_1 Linux kernel and modules (5.6 series) - source headers for 3rd party modules
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:26 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:28 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 12:34 ` pullmoll
` (11 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: ailiop-git @ 2020-04-02 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --]
New comment by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607815417
Comment:
same on glibc, i suppose infra needs a xbps-rindex -c crontab or something along those lines.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:28 ` ailiop-git
@ 2020-04-02 12:34 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:35 ` pullmoll
` (10 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 308 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607818724
Comment:
In case I wouldn't clean my repo on each update, I'd see ENOSPC more often.
Currently I am at 917GB of binary packages for all arches and the noarch brach ... yay.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:34 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 12:35 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:40 ` xtraeme
` (9 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607818724
Comment:
In case I wouldn't clean my repo on each update, I'd see ENOSPC more often.
Currently I am at 917GB of binary packages for all arches and the noarch branch ... yay.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:35 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 12:40 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:40 ` xtraeme
` (8 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 420 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607821236
Comment:
rofl almost 1TB :-)
I've tested 4.4 and 4.9 successfully, obviously those kernels don't support sway... but I'm using xorg successfully.
```
[juan@leysa ~]$ uname -a
Linux leysa 4.9.215_1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Mar 1 08:33:53 UTC 2020 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[juan@leysa ~]$
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:40 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:40 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:41 ` pullmoll
` (7 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 187 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607821528
Comment:
I'm going to remove linux3.16, @pullmoll ok?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:40 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:41 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:41 ` pullmoll
` (6 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607821901
Comment:
@xtrame go ahead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:41 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 12:41 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:47 ` xtraeme
` (5 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: pullmoll @ 2020-04-02 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 162 bytes --]
New comment by pullmoll on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607821901
Comment:
@xtraeme go ahead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:41 ` pullmoll
@ 2020-04-02 12:47 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:59 ` xtraeme
` (4 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 219 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607824843
Comment:
done, @ailiop-git did you test coreutils stat(1) with statx on 4.4/4.9 then?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:47 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 12:59 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 13:25 ` ailiop-git
` (3 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 209 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607830744
Comment:
I just updated all kernels to the latest version, just in case :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 12:59 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 13:25 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 13:30 ` xtraeme
` (2 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: ailiop-git @ 2020-04-02 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1497 bytes --]
New comment by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607845662
Comment:
Linux ash 4.4.215_1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Mar 1 08:34:51 UTC 2020 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ strace -fe statx,fstat stat -t /
statx(AT_FDCWD, "/", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT|AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, STATX_ALL, 0x7fff1d37dda0) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(0x88, 0), ...}) = 0
/ 4096 8 41ed 0 0 801 2 17 0 0 1585834498 1582119865 1582119865 0 4096
+++ exited with 0 +++
Linux ash 4.9.215_1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Mar 1 08:33:53 UTC 2020 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ strace -fe statx,fstat stat -t /
statx(AT_FDCWD, "/", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT|AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, STATX_ALL, 0x7fff1d37dda0) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(0x88, 0), ...}) = 0
/ 4096 8 41ed 0 0 801 2 17 0 0 1585834498 1582119865 1582119865 0 4096
+++ exited with 0 +++
Linux ash 5.4.23_1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Feb 29 10:14:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ strace -fe statx stat -t /
statx(AT_FDCWD, "/", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT|AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, STATX_ALL, {stx_mask=STATX_ALL, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, stx_size=4096, ...}) = 0
/ 4096 8 41ed 0 0 801 2 17 0 0 1585834498 1582119865 1582119865 1524685643 4096
+++ exited with 0 +++
@xtraeme looks OK, falling back to fstat in both 4.{4,9} (same stat binary, compiled against latest glibc on 5.4, statx enabled).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 13:25 ` ailiop-git
@ 2020-04-02 13:30 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 13:32 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 13:32 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " xtraeme
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607848440
Comment:
cool, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 13:30 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 13:32 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 13:32 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " xtraeme
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 253 bytes --]
New comment by xtraeme on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556#issuecomment-607849182
Comment:
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/commit/0010d6d3e63b86eef3c8af05af2e19b7f8465744
merged, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] re-enabling statx support on coreutils
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-02 13:32 ` xtraeme
@ 2020-04-02 13:32 ` xtraeme
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: xtraeme @ 2020-04-02 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 704 bytes --]
Closed issue by ailiop-git on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20556
Description:
Commit 9cd29dcf7e ("coreutils: disable statx() support on glibc.") disabled detection of statx support as a workaround, due to the kernel>=v4.11 requirement that breaks travis.
Restoring statx support in coreutils would be nice, as stat (1) and ls are able to report inode birth times only via statx.
@xtraeme not sure what the plan with travis is, but would it make sense to create a base-minimal-travis that depends on a coreutils-compat (or something, maybe a subpkg) that disables statx? That way we can re-enable it on coreutils so that base-system is not impacted.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-02 13:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-01 17:19 [ISSUE] re-enabling statx support on coreutils ailiop-git
2020-04-01 17:47 ` xtraeme
2020-04-01 18:02 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-01 18:07 ` xtraeme
2020-04-01 18:53 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-01 19:06 ` xtraeme
2020-04-01 21:18 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 9:40 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 11:12 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 11:21 ` Johnnynator
2020-04-02 11:23 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 11:26 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 11:29 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 11:32 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:12 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:14 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:17 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 12:19 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:20 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:20 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:21 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:22 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:23 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:23 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:24 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:26 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:28 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 12:34 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:35 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:40 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:40 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:41 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:41 ` pullmoll
2020-04-02 12:47 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 12:59 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 13:25 ` ailiop-git
2020-04-02 13:30 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 13:32 ` xtraeme
2020-04-02 13:32 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " xtraeme
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).