[PR PATCH] common/shlib: bump neatvnc shlib

[PR PATCH] common/shlib: bump neatvnc shlib

[maybe-one-day-ubermensch]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 453 bytes --]

There is a new pull request by maybe-one-day-ubermensch against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/maybe-one-day-ubermensch/void-packages neatvnc-shlibs
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/25190

common/shlib: bump neatvnc shlib
Should've done this in my previous [pr](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/25163)

A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/25190.patch is attached

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-neatvnc-shlibs-25190.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 731 bytes --]

From ec8ea50d5bbe0907375d4a9b862bce5ceb662686 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jony <maybe-one-day-ubermensch@protonmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:24:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] common/shlib: bump neatvnc shlib

---
 common/shlibs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/common/shlibs b/common/shlibs
index 5dc80d301d4..168c94c9086 100644
--- a/common/shlibs
+++ b/common/shlibs
@@ -3987,7 +3987,7 @@ libocl.so.2019.07 opencamlib-2019.07_1
 libcglm.so.0 cglm-0.7.6_1
 libfcft.so.3 fcft-2.2.2_1
 libaml.so.0 aml-0.1.0_1
-libneatvnc.so.0 neatvnc-0.2.0_1
+libneatvnc.so.0 neatvnc-0.3.2_1
 libtdjson.so.1.6.0 libtd-1.6.0_1
 libJudy.so.1 judy-1.0.5_1
 libsignal-protocol-c.so.2 libsignal-protocol-c-2.3.3_2

Re: common/shlib: bump neatvnc shlib

[Chocimier]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 730 bytes --]

New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/25190#issuecomment-700905147

Comment:
Entry in shlibs states minimal version of package that provides solib fulfilling requirements of consumers of solib. Usually if solib version is same, there is no need to modify shlibs. Exceptions exists, one of them is when upstream didn't increased solib despite of being incompatble, other is when updated solib provides symbols that are consumed by other packages.
If such exception is case here, you need to revbump consumers in this PR too, because building consumers is when information in shlib is actually used to set minimal required version of dependency in consumer package.

Re: common/shlib: bump neatvnc shlib

[maybe-one-day-ubermensch]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 231 bytes --]

New comment by maybe-one-day-ubermensch on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/25190#issuecomment-700936166

Comment:
Ooh I see. This cleared up some misconceptions I had. I appreciate it! :)

Re: [PR PATCH] [Closed]: common/shlib: bump neatvnc shlib

[maybe-one-day-ubermensch]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 261 bytes --]

There's a closed pull request on the void-packages repository

common/shlib: bump neatvnc shlib
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/25190

Description:
Should've done this in my previous [pr](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/25163)