* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
@ 2020-11-04 11:12 ` sgn
2020-11-04 11:24 ` amak79
` (21 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2020-11-04 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1346 bytes --]
New comment by sgn on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721669862
Comment:
On 2020-11-04 02:06:44-0800, amak79 <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> <!-- Don't request update of package. We have a script for that. https://alpha.de.repo.voidlinux.org/void-updates/void-updates.txt . However, a quality pull request may help. -->
> ### System
>
> * xuname:
> Void 5.8.18_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate rF
> * package:
> hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6
>
> ### Expected behavior
> `fsck.hfs` and `mkfs.hfsplus` should run without error.
> ### Actual behavior
> ```
> # fsck.hfs
> bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
> # mkfs.hfsplus
> bash: /bin/mkfs.hfsplus: No such file or directory
> ```
> This occurs with and without parameters being passed.
> ### Steps to reproduce the behavior
> ```
> # xbps-install hfsprogs
> # fsck.hfs
> # mkfs.hfsplus
> ```
> I tried rebuilding the package with `xbps-src` but I get the same result. Interestingly the package passes checks (`xbps-src check hfsprogs`), and I'm able to run the binaries from the build and install phases, but not after it's been packaged.
Do you have your "/bin" linked to "/usr/bin"?
Please try "ls -al /bin".
In my machine, "fsck.hfs" is installed under "/usr/bin" and "/bin"
should link to "usr/bin"
--
Danh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
2020-11-04 11:12 ` sgn
@ 2020-11-04 11:24 ` amak79
2020-11-04 15:05 ` sgn
` (20 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-04 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 252 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721675710
Comment:
`/bin` is linked to `usr/bin`:
```
# ls -al /bin
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Aug 21 21:26 /bin -> usr/bin
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
2020-11-04 11:12 ` sgn
2020-11-04 11:24 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-04 15:05 ` sgn
2020-11-04 15:06 ` sgn
` (19 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2020-11-04 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 241 bytes --]
New comment by sgn on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721786035
Comment:
Could you please check:
```sh
ls -al /usr/bin/fsck.hfs
file /usr/bin/fsck.hfs
strace fsck.hfs
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 15:05 ` sgn
@ 2020-11-04 15:06 ` sgn
2020-11-04 15:16 ` amak79
` (18 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2020-11-04 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1369 bytes --]
New comment by sgn on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721669862
Comment:
On 2020-11-04 02:06:44-0800, amak79 <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> <!-- Don't request update of package. We have a script for that. https://alpha.de.repo.voidlinux.org/void-updates/void-updates.txt . However, a quality pull request may help. -->
> ### System
>
> * xuname:
> Void 5.8.18_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate rF
> * package:
> hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6
>
> ### Expected behavior
> `fsck.hfs` and `mkfs.hfsplus` should run without error.
> ### Actual behavior
> ```
> # fsck.hfs
> bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
> # mkfs.hfsplus
> bash: /bin/mkfs.hfsplus: No such file or directory
> ```
> This occurs with and without parameters being passed.
> ### Steps to reproduce the behavior
> ```
> # xbps-install hfsprogs
> # fsck.hfs
> # mkfs.hfsplus
> ```
> I tried rebuilding the package with `xbps-src` but I get the same result. Interestingly the package passes checks (`xbps-src check hfsprogs`), and I'm able to run the binaries from the build and install phases, but not after it's been packaged.
Do you have your "/bin" linked to "/usr/bin"?
Please try "ls -al /bin".
In my machine, "fsck.hfs" is installed under "/usr/bin"
and "/bin" should link to "usr/bin"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 15:06 ` sgn
@ 2020-11-04 15:16 ` amak79
2020-11-04 15:27 ` ericonr
` (17 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-04 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721792322
Comment:
```
# ls -al /usr/bin/fsck.hfs
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 372472 Jul 4 09:08 /usr/bin/fsck.hfs
# file /usr/bin/fsck.hfs
/usr/bin/fsck.hfs: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, BuildID[sha1]=edebdfb10391134366021c20a944522a461a959f, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, stripped
# strace fsck.hfs
execve("/bin/fsck.hfs", ["fsck.hfs"], 0x7ffd11977140 /* 44 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
strace: exec: No such file or directory
+++ exited with 1 +++
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 15:16 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-04 15:27 ` ericonr
2020-11-04 15:33 ` amak79
` (16 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2020-11-04 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 224 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721799250
Comment:
Have you tried running `xbps-pkgdb hfsprogs` ? I couldn't reproduce this here :/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 15:27 ` ericonr
@ 2020-11-04 15:33 ` amak79
2020-11-04 15:38 ` amak79
` (15 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721802456
Comment:
Just ran `xbps-pkgdb hfsprogs` but it didn't help.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 15:33 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-04 15:38 ` amak79
2020-11-04 17:13 ` Duncaen
` (14 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-04 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 249 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721805554
Comment:
Installed `hfsprogs` on an RPi 3B+ arvm7l and it works. For some reason it won't work on my x86_64 install.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 15:38 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-04 17:13 ` Duncaen
2020-11-04 17:23 ` Chocimier
` (13 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Duncaen @ 2020-11-04 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 180 bytes --]
New comment by Duncaen on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721860977
Comment:
It works fine, check `xbps-pkgdb -a`.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 17:13 ` Duncaen
@ 2020-11-04 17:23 ` Chocimier
2020-11-04 23:45 ` amak79
` (12 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Chocimier @ 2020-11-04 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 235 bytes --]
New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721866406
Comment:
What's output of following commands?
```
df -hT
echo $PATH
PATH=/usr/bin fsck.hfs
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 17:23 ` Chocimier
@ 2020-11-04 23:45 ` amak79
2020-11-04 23:54 ` amak79
` (11 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-04 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 250 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-721805554
Comment:
I Installed `hfsprogs` on a RPi 3B+ arvm7l and it works. For some reason it won't work on my x86_64 install.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 23:45 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-04 23:54 ` amak79
2020-11-04 23:57 ` amak79
` (10 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-04 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1434 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722037739
Comment:
@Duncaen
```
# xbps-pkgdb -a
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /lib32 (target: /usr/lib32)
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /lib64 (target: /usr/lib)
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /usr/lib64 (target: /usr/lib)
```
That dosn't look good. This is a new install (20201103) using the chroot method from the docs, and a x86_64 rootfs I created with mkrootfs. I examined the tarball I used and it doesn't have the `/lib32`, `/lib64` and `/usr/lib64` symlinks. It only has `/lib -> use/lib`. After creating the `/lib64` synlink, both `fsck.hfs` and `mkfs.hfsplus` work.
@Chocimier
```
# df -hT
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs devtmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 888K 3.9G 1% /run
/dev/sda5 ext4 52G 2.4G 49G 5% /
cgroup tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 12K 3.9G 1% /tmp
tmpfs tmpfs 787M 4.0K 787M 1% /run/user/1000
# echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
# PATH=/usr/bin fsck.hfs
bash: /usr/bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 23:54 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-04 23:57 ` amak79
2020-11-05 0:15 ` amak79
` (9 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-04 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1434 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722037739
Comment:
@Duncaen
```
# xbps-pkgdb -a
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /lib32 (target: /usr/lib32)
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /lib64 (target: /usr/lib)
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /usr/lib64 (target: /usr/lib)
```
That dosn't look good. This is a new install (20201103) using the chroot method from the docs, and a x86_64 rootfs I created with mkrootfs. I examined the tarball I used and it doesn't have the `/lib32`, `/lib64` and `/usr/lib64` symlinks. It only has `/lib -> usr/lib`. After creating the `/lib64` synlink, both `fsck.hfs` and `mkfs.hfsplus` work.
@Chocimier
```
# df -hT
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs devtmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 888K 3.9G 1% /run
/dev/sda5 ext4 52G 2.4G 49G 5% /
cgroup tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 12K 3.9G 1% /tmp
tmpfs tmpfs 787M 4.0K 787M 1% /run/user/1000
# echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
# PATH=/usr/bin fsck.hfs
bash: /usr/bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-04 23:57 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-05 0:15 ` amak79
2020-11-05 14:13 ` ahesford
` (8 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-05 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722037739
Comment:
@Duncaen
```
# xbps-pkgdb -a
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /lib32 (target: /usr/lib32)
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /lib64 (target: /usr/lib)
ERROR: base-files: broken symlink /usr/lib64 (target: /usr/lib)
```
That dosn't look good. This is a new install (20201103) using the chroot method from the docs, and a x86_64 rootfs I created with `mkrootfs`. I examined the tarball I used and it doesn't have the `/lib32`, `/lib64` and `/usr/lib64` symlinks. It only has `/lib -> usr/lib`. After creating the `/lib64` synlink, both `fsck.hfs` and `mkfs.hfsplus` work.
@Chocimier
```
# df -hT
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs devtmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 888K 3.9G 1% /run
/dev/sda5 ext4 52G 2.4G 49G 5% /
cgroup tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs tmpfs 3.9G 12K 3.9G 1% /tmp
tmpfs tmpfs 787M 4.0K 787M 1% /run/user/1000
# echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
# PATH=/usr/bin fsck.hfs
bash: /usr/bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 0:15 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-05 14:13 ` ahesford
2020-11-05 14:13 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " ahesford
` (7 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: ahesford @ 2020-11-05 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 326 bytes --]
New comment by ahesford on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722403676
Comment:
You should probably make sure all of those links exist and that `xbps-pkgdb -a` doesn't complain about the `base-files` package.
Closing because this issue appears to be resolved.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 14:13 ` ahesford
@ 2020-11-05 14:13 ` ahesford
2020-11-05 14:46 ` amak79
` (6 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: ahesford @ 2020-11-05 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1057 bytes --]
Closed issue by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125
Description:
<!-- Don't request update of package. We have a script for that. https://alpha.de.repo.voidlinux.org/void-updates/void-updates.txt . However, a quality pull request may help. -->
### System
* xuname:
Void 5.8.18_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate rF
* package:
hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6
### Expected behavior
`fsck.hfs` and `mkfs.hfsplus` should run without error.
### Actual behavior
```
# fsck.hfs
bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
# mkfs.hfsplus
bash: /bin/mkfs.hfsplus: No such file or directory
```
This occurs with and without parameters being passed.
### Steps to reproduce the behavior
```
# xbps-install hfsprogs
# fsck.hfs
# mkfs.hfsplus
```
I tried rebuilding the package with `xbps-src` but I get the same result. Interestingly the package passes checks (`xbps-src check hfsprogs`), and I'm able to run the binaries from the build and install phases, but not after it's been packaged.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 14:13 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " ahesford
@ 2020-11-05 14:46 ` amak79
2020-11-05 14:46 ` amak79
` (5 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-05 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722423498
Comment:
Yes it's solved, bit is it normal for a rootfs tarball created by `mkrootfs` to be missing those symlinks? I've never had to create those links manually before.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 14:46 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-05 14:46 ` amak79
2020-11-05 14:51 ` ericonr
` (4 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-05 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722423498
Comment:
Yes it's solved, but is it normal for a rootfs tarball created by `mkrootfs` to be missing those symlinks? I've never had to create those links manually before.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 14:46 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-05 14:51 ` ericonr
2020-11-05 14:59 ` amak79
` (3 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2020-11-05 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 461 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722426846
Comment:
> Yes it's solved, but is it normal for a rootfs tarball created by mkrootfs to be missing those symlinks? I've never had to create those links manually before.
Shouldn't be, I have two ROOTFS installations... Do you still have the tarball? Are the links indeed missing from it? (you can check with `tar tf <file>`.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 14:51 ` ericonr
@ 2020-11-05 14:59 ` amak79
2020-11-05 15:04 ` ericonr
` (2 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-05 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 240 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722431977
Comment:
I still have the tarball. The `/lib32`, `/lib64` and `/usr/lib64` symlinks are definitely missing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 14:59 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-05 15:04 ` ericonr
2020-11-05 15:07 ` amak79
2020-11-05 15:09 ` Duncaen
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2020-11-05 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 218 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722434981
Comment:
Well, if you can reproduce it is definitely worth reporting in void-mklive.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 15:04 ` ericonr
@ 2020-11-05 15:07 ` amak79
2020-11-05 15:09 ` Duncaen
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: amak79 @ 2020-11-05 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --]
New comment by amak79 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722436686
Comment:
Alright will do. Thanks to everyone who helped with this issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory
2020-11-04 10:06 [ISSUE] hfsprogs-540.1.linux3_6: bash: /bin/fsck.hfs: No such file or directory amak79
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 15:07 ` amak79
@ 2020-11-05 15:09 ` Duncaen
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Duncaen @ 2020-11-05 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 393 bytes --]
New comment by Duncaen on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/26125#issuecomment-722438169
Comment:
https://github.com/void-linux/void-mklive/blob/2c7d8c02447a7ef0d81a9c292ee04c82c139679e/mkrootfs.sh.in#L184-L188 this was probably there from before those links were part of the base-files packages and were created with the base-files INSTALL script.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread